TinaD
Well-Known Member
- Relationship to Diabetes
- Type 2
Good morning. BG 6.00.
Lousy night with bad dreams. Nippy this morning. Off to Lampeter for Roman history course later.
Spent a lot of time reading research papers this last week. Apart from the irritation of difficulty in finding them from an economical source is added the scourge of the impracticality of most historians. Caesar says he encountered more than 4000 British chariots yet most of the historians think the pre-Roman Iron Age British didn't breed horses. So supposedly they managed to capture at least 8000 from the wild, break and train them, all without leaving any traces of where or how. Others think they must have imported them from abroad. Even without considering the huge cost they do not seem to consider what sort of boats were available to such Iron age people on the continent...
Why do they think so? Because there are very few immature horses (perhaps 2-or 3 skeletons) which have been found in excavating settlements/graveyards. In Britain they have only unearthed a matter of dozens of horse skeletons. Horses were not used until 4 years and above, most normal people would expect young stock to be in extensive pasture areas, which they haven't dug to find the fallen stock, even assuming it hadn't been munched by wolves/crows/foxes etc. I feel as if I am walking through mud...
Oh well, back to my studies once I have fed my resident neds.
Hope everyone has a good day.
Lousy night with bad dreams. Nippy this morning. Off to Lampeter for Roman history course later.
Spent a lot of time reading research papers this last week. Apart from the irritation of difficulty in finding them from an economical source is added the scourge of the impracticality of most historians. Caesar says he encountered more than 4000 British chariots yet most of the historians think the pre-Roman Iron Age British didn't breed horses. So supposedly they managed to capture at least 8000 from the wild, break and train them, all without leaving any traces of where or how. Others think they must have imported them from abroad. Even without considering the huge cost they do not seem to consider what sort of boats were available to such Iron age people on the continent...
Why do they think so? Because there are very few immature horses (perhaps 2-or 3 skeletons) which have been found in excavating settlements/graveyards. In Britain they have only unearthed a matter of dozens of horse skeletons. Horses were not used until 4 years and above, most normal people would expect young stock to be in extensive pasture areas, which they haven't dug to find the fallen stock, even assuming it hadn't been munched by wolves/crows/foxes etc. I feel as if I am walking through mud...
Oh well, back to my studies once I have fed my resident neds.
Hope everyone has a good day.