OK, conspiracy (or collection of conspiracies). So it was a real pandemic, but probably from a lab (perhaps deliberately produced or accidentally), and you think that many of the responses had various agendas behind them (connected to managing climate change and general ideas of controlling the population).
I think it's not really in question that there was significant fraud, at least aided by the government not wanting to look very hard. But that's about it: I think the vaccine development, production, sales were very much what they look like, etc.
The trouble with it all is no matter where you look, in every corner, every direction from start to finish, it's littered with gross, unbelievable, non sensical, non-scientific, mistakes etc, too many to be just chance, luck or oversight. No mistakes were made.
Take that one example above
https://forum.diabetes.org.uk/boards/threads/covid-19-response.105518/post-1309377
You claim to have found covid's asymptomatic spreader number one. You write and publish a paper to the medical profession around the world (which they relied and acted on), but failed to ask the most basic, fundamental question to this "asymptomatic spreader number one" which is; did you have any symptoms?
How can one claim to have found asymptomatic spreader no1 when they actually had symptoms?
The response to the sarscov2 virus has been like this at every turn, defying common sense, science, good practice, ethics, procedure.
Do you not think it odd that they told well people to stay home and those with symptoms to leave their homes (to get tested)? I mean, was the aim to try and reduce transmission or not? If so, why keep the well indoors and tell those sick with covid to go out and get a test (especially given there was no treatment (made public) available anyway)?
Failing to ask that asymptomatic spreader number one if they had symptoms was not a mistake.
Locking well people in was not a mistake.
Advising ill people out of their homes was not a mistake.
Scaring people away (stay at home) from hospital was not a mistake.
Not developing a traditional type vaccine was not a mistake.
Basically closing the nhs to anything but covid 19 was not a mistake.
Telling the public to protect the very thing (nhs) that is supposed to protect us was not a mistake.
Using the term safe and effective which is against the mhra blue guide on advertising was not a mistake.
Telling us nobody had any prior immunity to covid when they did was not a mistake.
Ignoring the JCVI advice on vaccines for children was not a mistake.
Playing down natural immunity was not a mistake.
Not carrying out a cost benefit analysis of lockdowns was not a mistake.
Not making public any treatments was not a mistake.
Eating out to help was not a mistake.
Using PCR test above the reliable threshold was not a mistake.
Throwing the elderly out of hospital was not a mistake.
Having hospitals beds lay empty for months was not a mistake.
Opening temporary (nightingale) hospitals when there was nobody to actually work in them is not a mistake.
Using psychological techniques, coercion and relentless fear was not a mistake.
Threatening employees with loss of their job if they didn't take the jab was not a mistake.
Using unreliable models from people with a track record of making bad models was not a mistake.
Showing people lying down dead in the street was not a mistake.
Not telling people that the best place to be is outside in the fresh air, exercise, sunshine (inc u.v which is great for killing airborne viruses) and vit D was not a mistake.
www.theguardian.com
