Einsteen, i agree about the vaccine and hope it has all the right checks, I do want a vaccine but not one that has been rushed through and not checked thoroughly (if that makes sense) Could it do more harm than good if it's not checked properly?!
If you die of swine flu, they call it 'natural causes'.
Ah, that explains it!
Ive google the vaccine and everyone is saying DO NOT get it, it is rushed through safety checks and you shouldn't take a vaccine that has been of the market less than 7 years. Eeek, i'm not sure i'd want it nowWho do you believe though?
If you die of swine flu, they call it 'natural causes'.
Ive google the vaccine and everyone is saying DO NOT get it, it is rushed through safety checks and you shouldn't take a vaccine that has been of the market less than 7 years. Eeek, i'm not sure i'd want it nowWho do you believe though?
when it comes to anything medical my rule is generally not to trust google!
If you die of swine flu, they call it 'natural causes'.
Ive google the vaccine and everyone is saying DO NOT get it, it is rushed through safety checks and you shouldn't take a vaccine that has been of the market less than 7 years. Eeek, i'm not sure i'd want it nowWho do you believe though?
It was people's opinions about the vaccine on a newspaper article, i'm very aware they have no medical qualifications, but literally everyone said they wont be having the vaccine so it made me wonder. I'm also aware that the people who bothered to comment were probably the ones who are against it.
I will consider it if Gordon Brown has his first.
Well, there is an element of truth in not taking anything thats been around and tested on others, but clinical trials are limited, so someone has to be the first to use a product no matter how much testing they did.
I understood flu vaccines were developed each year on the basis of the assessment by the WHO as to which flu was to be that years number one. If thats the case aren't all flu vaccines produced on very short cycles?
By the nature of this virus, it will be rushed, there are two different companies working on the vaccine from what I gather, its now down to the risk factor for us of the vaccine and marginal potential of a reaction/problem or swine flu and the risk associated with us having supressed immune systems.
Personally, I will opt for the vaccine, we won't probably get it until the medical profession have all had theirs. And if a bunch of doctors and nurses will take the vaccine, its a reasonable call its not so bad 🙄
And if a bunch of doctors and nurses will take the vaccine, its a reasonable call its not so bad 🙄
Ha ha, how long should we wait and see what the reaction is - couod we tell the diffference!
It was people's opinions about the vaccine on a newspaper article, i'm very aware they have no medical qualifications, but literally everyone said they wont be having the vaccine so it made me wonder. I'm also aware that the people who bothered to comment were probably the ones who are against it.
I will consider it if Gordon Brown has his first.
Until its out I don't think there isn't much to speculate on.
I'd pay for his to be switched to something nasty!😱
Hehe Just read this:
Lets say the government had developed a tiny tracking device so small and sophisticated that it could be planted in the blood stream - with a battery that had a life of say 10 years... they could then track every person in the country.
How would they convince everyone to take it? Easy, create a virus, cause widespread panic and then announce that they have enough of the vaccine for everyone in the country. Voila! Everyone is cueing up to be unknowingly injected with the ultimate tracking device!!
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=1071452