In general, I use one hour as my most used test time because I've found that usually finds my peak. These days, by the 2 hour mark, I'm usually back around 4.5ish no matter what I have eaten.
However, in the case of fruit, when I've done this testing what I usually do is as follows:
I test before I start - then eat a piece of fruit - test one hour after finishing eating - I then eat another piece of different fruit - test again one hour after finishing eating the second piece - then eat yet another piece of a different fruit - test after another hour after eating the third piece of fruit - and so on.............
In doing that my one hour readings are also the before reading for the second and subsequent piece of fruit - also, I'd be picking up any later spike. I never spike no matter how much fruit I eat or for how long I've carried on - i.e. sometimes up to 5 hours.
Hope that explains things.
Yes - testing is always very important when carrying out any such experiment with foods that can cause elevated blood glucose levels. I certainly agree with that.
Best wishes - John
Wally.
Someone once said, " You cannot be serious !!" You are joking aren't you ?
How on earth can you get a true reading testing in such a manner ?
You say you eat a piece of fruit and then test after 1 hr, fair enough. Then you say you eat another piece of fruit and test after another hour, ad infinitum ??? Frankly, that is lunacy.
Are you just thinking that the difference between the readings is all you need ? You have to just take readings at 1, 2, 3,and possibly 4 hrs without feeding yourself in between, by testing in the way you are you are just getting meaningless figures. Everything will be compounded as you go along.
If I was to test like that my numbers would just go up and up ad infinitum !
All those fine looking numbers are just meaningless. In all my years on forums I don't think I have ever seen such misguided thinking, misleading and frankly dangerous. New members need to ignore this strange advice.
How do you think that is going to give accurate Blood Glucose readings ? All you are doing is destroying any evidence of what test results you had and making it a mockery of evidence of your blood glucose readings. Which I am sure most of us thought were admirable, not any more my friend.
I have noticed that you are quoting these testing figures as if they are factual. Sorry Wally they are just plain useless. Who on earth told you to test in that fashion ? They were obviously not a diabetic. I would have thought any half decent diabetic could tell you that Wally.
I sincerely hope any new and inexperienced members are not trying to test as you are, they are storing up masses of trouble for themselves. Your method goes against all the advice on any forum I have been on, it is plain ridiculous !
I am sorry Admin but this is just bad to have displayed as being a credible method of testing.
Dave