IrvineHimself
Well-Known Member
- Relationship to Diabetes
- Type 2
I think you ar talking far larger numbers in the private sector, I know several pensioners who had low level jobs, (even cleaners and shop assistants,) who are now quite comfortably off because of various employment pensions. Sometimes they have income from as many as 5 or more pension schemes they have been enrolled in + the state pension.
In the early naughties, pension and health benefit liabilities were a serious drain on large companies. In the US, one of the main economic arguments in favour of universal health coverage and state funded pensions is the drain on the economy caused by employers having to cover these benefits. Companies like General Motors couldn't compete with European and Japanese car makers because of the cost of health coverage and employee pensions for the US workforce.
While the example I gave was the US, even in the UK, the wiggling and evasion the private sector has been going through to get out of accumulated pension liabilities is almost entertaining, or at least it would be if it didn't have such potentially dangerous consequences.
In fact, as a direct consequence of Brexit and our xenophobic Home Secretary, the demographic time bomb is about to become an awful lot worse. To pay current pension liabilities, we require a young, economically ambitious workforce. In other words: safe legal immigration. But, by closing down immigration and creating a hostile environment, we do not have the correct demographic balance to make the system work. Pre-referendum, I once tried to explain this to a rabid Brexiteer, his reply: "Oh, but the government pays my pension!"
In the early naughties, pension and health benefit liabilities were a serious drain on large companies. In the US, one of the main economic arguments in favour of universal health coverage and state funded pensions is the drain on the economy caused by employers having to cover these benefits. Companies like General Motors couldn't compete with European and Japanese car makers because of the cost of health coverage and employee pensions for the US workforce.
While the example I gave was the US, even in the UK, the wiggling and evasion the private sector has been going through to get out of accumulated pension liabilities is almost entertaining, or at least it would be if it didn't have such potentially dangerous consequences.
In fact, as a direct consequence of Brexit and our xenophobic Home Secretary, the demographic time bomb is about to become an awful lot worse. To pay current pension liabilities, we require a young, economically ambitious workforce. In other words: safe legal immigration. But, by closing down immigration and creating a hostile environment, we do not have the correct demographic balance to make the system work. Pre-referendum, I once tried to explain this to a rabid Brexiteer, his reply: "Oh, but the government pays my pension!"