Thanks Feathers 🙂Well done for resisting!
What app are you using by the way?
Am trying to only weight & test once a week (constant monitoring was adding to the pressure/not doing me any good) So no new numbers. But am sticking to the 1100-1200. Still enjoying the shakes. Finding it easier than I expected not to eat in the evenings. I am slightly hungrier than I was on the 800, probably predictably - but I also have a TON more energy.Thanks Feathers 🙂
How is your's going?
I had a bit more Soy sauce than usual with a stir fry last night - might be coincidence that my BP ticked up this morning.Have you seen the doc to get alpha blockers yet, only your BP is getting a bit low now ....
Alpha blockers are often taken for BPH (prostate issues) so Tamsulosin is a common one. That may be why you have heard of it.I looked up alpha blockers on the NHS site, cos I couldn't remember where I'd heard of them from - but anyway was saying that you had to watch out for orthostatic hypotension, and I was aware from looking at your graphs how lovely your BP was!
My husband's was similar all his life - and when I first visited their house was astonished to discover the seat was never left up, even if he'd only just been before I needed to. After we got together I asked him about this and apparently a couple of times in the past when he'd been in bed and woke up and had to shoot the loo pdq, he'd literally fallen over with a crash and woke the hole house up as he hit everything between him and the floor. So although he could and would stand up, he usually sits down to wee as well as big jobs! After his prostatectomy - they wouldn't let him come home cos his BP was only 118 over 60 - and I was saying to the ward sister - What the hell have you been doing to him in here? - you're clearly stressing him out, according to his BP on your machine! And he was saying OK I'll stay in and be bed blocking until I pop me clogs then ..... or you could try ringing my consultant and asking him if I usually have a lowish BP, and see what he says.
Recent book on metabolism by leading researcher Herman Pontzer (witht that name, he better be a leading researcher!): https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/603894/burn-by-herman-pontzer-phd/Metabolism - Heart Rate
Week 5 of the Newcastle 800 calorie a day diet and the change in my resting heart rate is quite marked.
Prior to the diet my resting heart rate averaged 64bpm, and this week 54bpm.
View attachment 17554
View attachment 17555
You would expect the heart to have easier time of now I'm 12Kg lighter, but it is a significant drop.
Reading around the subject I learned:
Caloric restriction is known to produce a short-term reduction in resting metabolic rate. Adaptive thermogenesis (AT) has been proposed to be a compensatory response that may resist weight loss and promote weight regain
Well this seems bad news, the body slows down in response to fewer calories.
I felt I was maintaining / increasing the activity I was doing. But the data shows that whilst I felt I was doing more I wasn't.
Ideally the diet would burn fat, but leave the fat free mass unaffected by protein oxidation (burning muscle)
The research is fairly inconsistent. Some state AT is temporary, others that is the reason diets fail in the long term.
This article describes a few things to do to off set the problem.
I'm going to increase weight training and started adding whey protein to the dietary mix (increase calories)
I started yesterday and have added 0.4kg this morning :-(
Early days.
Blood Pressure update - Still low in the morning, but perks up to normal after some water and coffee
View attachment 17552
Thanks Eddy,Recent book on metabolism by leading researcher Herman Pontzer (witht that name, he better be a leading researcher!): https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/603894/burn-by-herman-pontzer-phd/
Pontzer’s groundbreaking studies with hunter-gatherer tribes show how exercise doesn’t increase our metabolism. Instead, we burn calories within a very narrow range: nearly 3,000 calories per day, no matter our activity level. This was a brilliant evolutionary strategy to survive in times of famine. Now it seems to doom us to obesity. The good news is we can lose weight, but we need to cut calories. Refuting such weight-loss hype as paleo, keto, anti-gluten, anti-grain, and even vegan, Pontzer discusses how all diets succeed or fail: For shedding pounds, a calorie is a calorie.
It's better than the blurb and the hype on the cover. Basically: No matter how active you are, you'll burn about the same amount of energy. So eg despite being way more active, Hadza hunter gatherers burn about the same as Western office workers. Most of the energy you burn is your cells doing their various things, not related to exercise. When you exercise more, what yr cells do changes to keep total expenditure about the same.
FWIW, I wouldn't combine a very low calorie diet with lots of exercise. Note that Roy Taylor recommends against it. Focus on calorie reduction to lose the weight, and when you're at target, increase calories to a "normal" level and stack on exercise to maintain the weight loss.
For other really interesting good science on weight stuff, check out Kevin Hall's work. Lead obesity etc researcher at the US National Institutes for Health, a number of groundbreaking experiments and studies in recent years.
![]()
Publications - Kevin D. Hall, Ph.D. - NIDDK
A highlight of the most recent influential research publications from Kevin D. Hall, Ph.D.www.niddk.nih.gov
Good luck!Thanks Eddy,
I appreciate your reply, I will search out Herman Pontzer and Kevin Hall. I'm a bit lazy so I tend to look for the book launch videos of any book I'm interested in rather than read the book. I will watch this: Dr Herman Pontzer - the author of Burn
Your description of Pontzer's work reminded Daniel E. Lieberman's new book, “Exercised: Why Something We Never Evolved to Do Is Healthy and Rewarding” Here's a nice 10 minute video from him:
5 Common Exercise Myths Debunked | Daniel Lieberman
I saw that Prof Taylor advises against exercise + diet, his rationale is that exercise tends to make people hungry and that post exercise people feel they have 'earned' extra calorie credits to eat more (We always overestimate how many we burn).
I'm comfy that I won't fall into that trap.
There is a fair bit of research (one example paper attached) illustrating that exercise + VLCD results in the same weight loss as VLCD only, but you retain more muscle mass and lose more adipose fat as a %.
But to be honest, week 5 and I'm getting fed up with constipation, slower weight loss and a bit concerned about blood pressure and resting heart rate. My fasting blood sugars are fine now. In week 4 my motivation switched from T2 remission to:
~Complete the 8 weeks to prove I can
~Get from a 43" to a 37" waist and / or healthy body fat %
I'm tempted to move off the 800 calories and carry on with just no more beer (alcohol in general) or bread