New review of Bikman's "Why We Get Sick"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't think you'll have any luck changing his/her mindset.

Not with that amazing fail to understand.
Obviously @bulkbiker imagines the "average age" was taken from the register of births and deaths, no doubt kept since the history of mankind.

It'll be an interesting post coming when he understands (or if) the reality is it's the average age of adult skeletons found at the time.
And the average age of mature adults living it up on meat wasn't a good old age at all.
 
Don't think you'll have any luck changing his/her mindset.
I thought the idea of this statement was to remind us all we don't need to change anyone's mindset unless they want to do so. Yes, it talks about specifically diabetes, so maybe anything else is fair game?

1670867503767.png
 
I thought the idea of this statement was to remind us all we don't need to change anyone's mindset unless they want to do so. Yes, it talks about specifically diabetes, so maybe anything else is fair game?

View attachment 23287

Got no idea what your on about, but sometimes in life you have to hold your hands up & admit your wrong when facts are laid before you, there's no shame doing so.
 
Got no idea what your on about, but sometimes in life you have to hold your hands up & admit your wrong when facts are laid before you, there's no shame doing so.
Agreed
 
Hi @bulkbiker

The thread has got really fragmented and I can't make any sense of it. Would you be able to succinctly summarise your point?

Thanks.
It started off with a pointedly biased review of Prof Ben Bikman's book by someone unqualified to make the claims that they did.

A claim was then made that meat was recently introduced into the "Industrialised Western Diet" which is patent nonsense. But was used as some kind of evidence.

I then claimed that as man had eaten meat for millennia to blame it in any part for recent epidemics in obesity and T2 is ridiculous. The then usual idiotic point about the lifespan of ancient humans being very short was then claimed as some kind of "gotcha" ignoring the minor point that infant mortality was very high and there was no medicine for anything.

Then the usual suspects here decided to pile in with more nonsense and I gave up.

That just about sums it up from my perspective.

It seems that certain members here have zero respect for the opinions of others when they differ from their own and will brook no argument but instead indulge themselves with stupid and childish retorts.
 
Bikman is one of the promoters of the omega-6-is-evil tropes infesting the Internet.

Here's a new piece with Dr Kevin Maky, president of the American National Lipid Association taking about seed oils and heart risk:


(Gil Carvalho does a good job of getting top scientists on his YouTube pieces. )
 
Bikman is one of the promoters of the omega-6-is-evil tropes infesting the Internet.

Here's a new piece with Dr Kevin Maky, president of the American National Lipid Association taking about seed oils and heart risk:


(Gil Carvalho does a good job of getting top scientists on his YouTube pieces. )
Another "unbiased" vegan I guess?
 
I guess a biased Carnivore wouldn’t bother watching it.
 
I guess a biased Carnivore wouldn’t bother watching it.
I don't have heart disease and don't consume seed oils so why bother.. it's simply not relevant to me and I have better things to do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top