GPs to manage 50% of Type-1 diabetic patients under CCG plans

Status
Not open for further replies.
Northerner

Northerner

Admin (Retired)
Relationship to Diabetes
Type 1
EXCLUSIVE General practice could be managing as many as 50% of Type-1 diabetes patients under plans drawn up by a CCG, which would see many discharged from specialist management.

NHS Dorset CCG’s proposal for a new community diabetes schemesuggests that ‘stable’ patients with Type-1 diabetes - as many as 50% - could be discharged from secondary care management, with commissioners monitoring practices’ referrals and admissions rates.

The CCG has said that the ‘commissioning intention’ it has issued is a first step before consultation with GPs, but one practice told Pulse it was already being presented to staff as a ‘done deal’.

The GPC has said it was ‘flabbergasted’ that a service could propose such a high level of specialist management from practices without details of how GPs would be supported or funded.

http://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/news/co...tic-patients-under-ccg-plans/20032125.article

(free registration)

Already happened to me here in Hampshire - no longer see my consultant, just practice nurse. Also, reviews have gone from 6 monthly to annual. Thought the following comment was interesting/scary:

Already happening in Liverpool. However, some of those being discharged are only classifiable as "stable" in that their IFCC is persistently dreadful, not because their diabetes is well controlled! Yes, it's cheaper in the community but which part of the job can we choose to eliminate in order to look after these patients? Oh, yes.........that's right.........none
Click to expand...

:(
 
I think it's disgusting !

In Poole, the practice nurses were told last week, but no-one has mentioned it to the doctors yet ! Apparently - the normal GP contract actually states 'no extra work without training and pay'.

So - if you get into trouble, where/who have you been told to ring?
 
trophywench said:
I think it's disgusting !

In Poole, the practice nurses were told last week, but no-one has mentioned it to the doctors yet ! Apparently - the normal GP contract actually states 'no extra work without training and pay'.

So - if you get into trouble, where/who have you been told to ring?
Click to expand...
I still have the ability to phone a DSN. I used to enjoy my twice-yearly chats with my consultant though, I used to bring him up to date with all the appalling treatment people were talking about on the forum! 😱 🙂

I can understand that I'm not a priority for specialist treatment, my highest HbA1c since diagnosis was 6.2% and the last one was 5.3%, but it is worrying if they are not necessarily talking about good control when they say 'stable', but could mean someone whose HbA1c is always around 10%! 😱 :(
 
My reservations would be that staff would need to be appropriately trained! I know the GP at my surgery who was so called Diabetic doctor retired a year ago and has not been replaced!
 
IMO This is so wrong and more likely to be to do with cost cutting.
 
I'm stable though - but how the hell would my GP surgery be able to keep the track on my results that my hospital clinic do? Pumping is more and more commonplace, isn't it?

And let's not forget that the time when young people's control usually goes out of the window if it's going to, is around the time they get transferred to adult services. I fear that even more of them will fall by the wayside.

Alan - have you drawn this to DUK's attention?
 
trophywench said:
I'm stable though - but how the hell would my GP surgery be able to keep the track on my results that my hospital clinic do? Pumping is more and more commonplace, isn't it?

And let's not forget that the time when young people's control usually goes out of the window if it's going to, is around the time they get transferred to adult services. I fear that even more of them will fall by the wayside.

Alan - have you drawn this to DUK's attention?
Click to expand...
No, but I will do. There's also the little point of GP surgeries already being massively overstretched already - where are they going to find all these extra resources from? :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ljc
I recently heard a practice nurse on a phone in saying they were having problems recruiting an retaining staff!
 
Northerner said:
No, but I will do. There's also the little point of GP surgeries already being massively overstretched already - where are they going to find all these extra resources from? :(
Click to expand...
Very true.
 
All this happened in Oxfordshire several years ago. I was discharged back to my GP because my hospital consultant said there was a 'specialist diabetic nurse' at our surgery. Who turned out to be the Asthma nurse, the Travel Clinic nurse, the Lord High Everything Else nurse...Actually, she's great, I get on well with her, and she's keen to learn ( mostly from me) But the surgery have declined her request to be sent on a course to learn how to deal with Type 1s, 'because it's not worth it as I'm her only one!'
I was discharged with the proviso that I could ask to be referred back at any point if I had problems, but as I said to the nurse last year, the problem is, what I don't know that I don't know.
 
Robin said:
but as I said to the nurse last year, the problem is, what I don't know that I don't know.
Click to expand...
Indeed - whilst many people may look to the internet for information about new treatments etc., what about those who don't? Is an untrained practice nurse going to be bang up to date with the latest information? 🙄 It's OK being able to ask for help if you know you have a problem, but what if you don't know you have a problem, but a specialist would?
 
My nurse was retiring just after my last review before Xmas , said as she was only part time she was struggling to keep up to date with everything! She did not think they would be replacing her , as the other nurse was full time! So I was surprised when I saw the Doctor for reauthorisation of medications last week she happened to mentioned there was now another Diabetic nurse!
Though I believe my up coming appointment is with the one who has been there a while! I have my bloods tomorrow !
 
Oh no that's awful :(. GPs have no clue about type 1, no clue about pumps and CGM, and are totally overstretched as it is. Surely this is an area that MUST have a specialist consultant?
 
I was similar to Robin in that I was seen at the surgery. The nurse is lovely but covers various things at the surgery as well as diabetes. The majority of her diabetes time will be spent dealing with T2's. From a T1 point of view I think she simply doesn't have the depth of knowledge that you get at a hospital clinic keeping abreast of the latest technology, insulins, pumps etc. I asked about pumps last December and have been referred back to the hospital clinic and seen the consultant. I have since been on a DAFNE course and now have access to the DSN's at the hospital clinic.
 
Redkite said:
Oh no that's awful :(. GPs have no clue about type 1, no clue about pumps and CGM, and are totally overstretched as it is. Surely this is an area that MUST have a specialist consultant?
Click to expand...

Well that's what the NICE Guidelines dated September 2015 say they should have, so you aren't the ONLY one that thinks we should !!!!

Diabetes Voices just today have asked me to get my MP to attend a thing they are presenting to Parliament to try and get at least 50% of D patients (all types) access to training courses.

I was going to do this - but what's the ruddy point, when they aren't even going to be able to TREAT people properly in the first place?

And every surgery everywhere has terrible problems recruiting every type of MEDICAL staff they need (still OK on the 'office' side) and most now are staffed 50% or more by locums.
 
Good God, if they did that here I'd have to move, my GP surgery don't have a clue, and frankly I'd probably just disengage from it altogether. I go to their reviews now under duress because it's a waste of my time, the diabetic nurse is a wasp, very sharp, so sharp she could cut herself, but then I'm like a serrated knife if I get started so that'll be great then.
 
Really alarming 😱 On what criteria would they select the 50% to manage? In the last State of the Nation only 7.6% of T1's had an HbA1c of 6.5% or less and only 27.6% an HbA1c of 7.5% or less and that is supposing lower HbA1c values equal stability which we know isn't necessarily true as they can hide a multitude of control issues.
 
The first and last time I had a review the practice nurse turned round and said I know nothing about those new fangled pump things and don't want to know either.

Each year I have a request to attend a yearly review latest is at 6.50pm on 27th July I have cancelled with the reason being waste of time and pointless box ticking exercise.
 
Flower said:
Really alarming 😱 On what criteria would they select the 50% to manage? In the last State of the Nation only 7.6% of T1's had an HbA1c of 6.5% or less and only 27.6% an HbA1c of 7.5% or less and that is supposing lower HbA1c values equal stability which we know isn't necessarily true as they can hide a multitude of control issues.
Click to expand...
Living under Dorset CCG's umbrella, it does concern me somewhat (slight understatement:D). I suspect mine would be viewed as stable, but would they view me as T1? Though on the other hand I'm going to meet my 6th diabetes consultant in less than 5 years in a couple of weeks. I might get more continuity of care. But then what does the average GP know about pumps, cgms...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top