I think I'll listen to that Ralph...good tip...thank you.The Food Programme (12:30pm, today (Sun 1 July) BBC Radio 4.) will be discussing whether "the Govenments eat well plate advice is doing harm". According to the trailer.
The ones I've seen have always had a protein section, (which might have included pulses & beans, along with meat etc) that was bigger than the fats section & smaller than the veg and carb sections.I've just started a X-Pert diabetes course run by our local CCG.
On version 12 of the course, there is a modified Eatwell plate, with the usual third Fruit & Veg / sixth Protein / sixth Milk & Dairy
and the remaining third split between Fats / Carbs according to whether you follow Low Fat or Low Carb regime.
Perhaps you could tell us why DUK do not recognise that?...or would this be a question for @Hannah DUK ...my understanding is that DUK while now recognising (finally) that the low carb is the right approach still advocate low carb/low fat...we know of course that most/many low fat products & foodstuffs have sugar & other flavour enhancers added to improve the flavour when the fat is removed...which of course means more carbs...it doesn't make any sense at all.I think this is the thing that has always struck me. The eatwell plate may not be bad for people with a fully functioning metabolism and/or who are not genetically predisposed to diabetes - but for those with diabetes or who are in the process of moving in that direction it can be a recipe for disaster.
It’s slightly better in proportions than it has been in the past - you may be able to ‘get away with it’ if using basal:bolus insulin, but if diet+activity is your primary BG management tool, then the proportions of eatwell seem less than ideal.
would this be a question for @Hannah DUK ....
I'm afraid I find Diabetes UK a bit lacking here. You don't necessarily need to go all out for low card.Yes 🙂
Diabetes UK advocate for a range of different approaches to healthy eating for diabetes, and for people to find what works best for them. This could be low carb, Mediterranean, and many more. The important thing is that it fits into your lifestyle and is tailored to your needs. What works for one person, may not definitively work for another, so we support individuals in taking different approaches that they find to be beneficial for their own diabetes.
The recent recommendation for the low carb approach has (as I understand it) been the first major change in dietary advice from DUK since 2011...I'm wondering how they reconcile recommending a low carb diet and combining it with low fat...low fat foods have a significantly higher carbohydrate content than full fat foods on the products/foodstuffs I have compared...surely that completely negates the low carb advice/recommendation call it what you will?Yes 🙂
Diabetes UK advocate for a range of different approaches to healthy eating for diabetes, and for people to find what works best for them. This could be low carb, Mediterranean, and many more. The important thing is that it fits into your lifestyle and is tailored to your needs. What works for one person, may not definitively work for another, so we support individuals in taking different approaches that they find to be beneficial for their own diabetes.
Good point Ralph.I'm afraid I find Diabetes UK a bit lacking here. You don't necessarily need to go all out for low card.
You could go for firmer language for managing carbohydrates. You can do this while supporting individuals finding which type of carbs and quantities work for them.
Apparently there used to be a separate wedge for "Processed Foods" - it was removed and placed in the middle as the portion allocation seemed to suggest thatThat's interesting Bamba. I've never seen any with a processed food section/note. Sometimes people would stick all the processed/takeaways/rubbish (the facilitator used blunter words) into the fats section.