I know I'm going to incur lots of people's wrath with this but, in playing devil's advocate, in what way does this DLA actually help a diebetic? Isn't it just some extra cash? It doesn't help overcome night hypos or improve BGs nor is it enough to allow a parent to give up work and care full time.
In this day and age when Diabetics are trying to persue normal lives and not feel disabled doesn't DLA move us another step towards being regarded as disabled rather than living with a condition? Don't we try and live as normal a life as possible? Diabetic children go to normal schools, we expect the school staff to understand their needs, for no extra money but at home we expect to get extra benefits?
OK, got my hard hat on!
Hi Amanda,
The reason parents/carers are entitled to claim disability living allowance is because they are carers.
Because we have to make checks at random times throughout the night on occasion - this makes it near impossible to be employable - due to the fact that we are on call 24 hours a day. What employer wants to employ someone who may need to leave at a moments notice? Who wants to employ someone who is obviously tired through night time checking and incapable of doing a good days work?
The carers allowance we are entitled to is supposed to be the equivalent of how much it would cost to employ a nurse to do the night time checks etc.
This comes to the hefty amount of 53 pence per hour approx. I am certain that if this job were advertised there would be no takers!
All this is made even harder on carers due to the fact that we arent paying into a pension so therefore are facing a financial loss in the future until such time as our children are old enough to care for themselves.
Your absolutely right - the money does not take away hypos etc or make their lives any easier to deal with as regards diabetes and its complications, but it does go some way to helping with extra costs that we occur as a direct result of having a diabetic child. Food being a big part of this, since diagnosis our food bill has gone up by about one quarter - simply due to the fact that we try to buy the healthier cuts of meat and fish and now we HAVE to buy hypo treatments (rarely bought sweets or biscuits before this) whether we want to or not.
There are also other costs that we have as a direct result of having a diabetic child, like if my son is feeling ill whilst we are out and just wants to get home - a taxi doesnt come cheap (if we dont have the car that day) or free. We have bought various extra sporting items to encourage doing extra exercise as we all know that exercise helps long term and helps reduce high levels etc.
Also, there are occasions when my son isnt able to join in the fun because his levels are either far too low or far too high - so we take the view that a trip to the cinema will help him to feel like he is having fun aswell - the cinema isnt cheap either. A child without diabetes can join in anything at any time - but a diabetic child often has to watch from the sidelines.
I have to do extra washing when his levels are too high through the night due to growth hormones - he wets the bed sometimes because of high levels, and this incurs extra sets of bedding etc and washing powder. This wouldnt happen if he wasnt diabetic.
Diabetes within a family setting doesnt just affect the child - it affects the whole family and incurs many extra costs that we wouldnt have had if our children were not diabetic.
There are more examples i could give you - but i think i have covered enough here.
What i would add to the above is that if someone offered to swop my 53 pence an hour for a little boy who didnt have diabetes - then i would gladly make the swop!
Both myself and my sons father have worked full time for a total of appox 50 years between us , so i think we have paid enough into the benefits system to warrant our 53 pence per hour.
If your views on claiming disability living allowance is the same across the board, it would seem that there is no reason to allow a blind person any benefit because it will not improve their eyesight. Or a paraplegic - because it will not make them walk. Or anybody else with a chronic medical condition - because money wont make them better. And thats the point! It isnt there to make them better - its there to ease their daily lives - because their lives are infinateley more difficult with their disabilities than that of their peers.
Just because people cant 'see' diabetes - doesnt mean its not a disability.
Bev
p.s. Perhaps teachers should claim more money for helping a child from going into a coma - but that is up to them to deal with - us parents and carers have enough stress dealing with diabetes.