- Relationship to Diabetes
- Type 1
- Pronouns
- He/Him
I was going to post this in another thread, but it felt like it might be a bit of a hijack so I'll start another and see how others feel...
Right now it feels like I have to make a choice between food variety and good control.
It's a little dramatic, and my own gut instinct if I were to read that would be, 'Oh no - that's not the case at all!' but let me explain...
For the second school holiday in a row I've had significantly worse levels. Not just a bit worse but lots, lots worse. Massive post-meal spikes. Or hypos. (17.x-2.x). Whole days in the teens. Liver dumps seeming to come from undetected overnight hypos (or possibly because for the second school holiday in a row I got a bit of a cold). During these times food tends to be a bit more varied and even 'only slightly unusual' things I'm sure I have counted correctly don't behave. Before the holiday I had several days with all but no readings lower than 3.8 or higher than 9.
So at the moment it feels like I have to choose between food variety and excellent control. The only way for me to achieve consistently good numbers seems to be to reduce the variables. To go with tried and tested meal choices and amounts. Some of those (fish and chips for example) might seem to be risky, but we use the same chippy, choose the same couple of things, and I've a split dose approach that seems to work most of the time. I'm not all 'woe is me' and think I've got a pretty good, varied diet, but it's far from eat whatever low-med GI stuff you want in whatever quantity.
My ratios, such as they are, seem more linked to responding appropriately to a few sets of meal types rather than being universally applicable. In short, they do not seem to be very scalable at all.
Do others feel the same way? Has anyone managed to get their ratios worked out that so that they can cope with anything from 30 - 150g CHO and have the doses work consistently well?
Right now it feels like I have to make a choice between food variety and good control.
It's a little dramatic, and my own gut instinct if I were to read that would be, 'Oh no - that's not the case at all!' but let me explain...
For the second school holiday in a row I've had significantly worse levels. Not just a bit worse but lots, lots worse. Massive post-meal spikes. Or hypos. (17.x-2.x). Whole days in the teens. Liver dumps seeming to come from undetected overnight hypos (or possibly because for the second school holiday in a row I got a bit of a cold). During these times food tends to be a bit more varied and even 'only slightly unusual' things I'm sure I have counted correctly don't behave. Before the holiday I had several days with all but no readings lower than 3.8 or higher than 9.
So at the moment it feels like I have to choose between food variety and excellent control. The only way for me to achieve consistently good numbers seems to be to reduce the variables. To go with tried and tested meal choices and amounts. Some of those (fish and chips for example) might seem to be risky, but we use the same chippy, choose the same couple of things, and I've a split dose approach that seems to work most of the time. I'm not all 'woe is me' and think I've got a pretty good, varied diet, but it's far from eat whatever low-med GI stuff you want in whatever quantity.
My ratios, such as they are, seem more linked to responding appropriately to a few sets of meal types rather than being universally applicable. In short, they do not seem to be very scalable at all.
Do others feel the same way? Has anyone managed to get their ratios worked out that so that they can cope with anything from 30 - 150g CHO and have the doses work consistently well?