• Please Remember: Members are only permitted to share their own experiences. Members are not qualified to give medical advice. Additionally, everyone manages their health differently. Please be respectful of other people's opinions about their own diabetes management.
  • We seem to be having technical difficulties with new user accounts. If you are trying to register please check your Spam or Junk folder for your confirmation email. If you still haven't received a confirmation email, please reach out to our support inbox: support.forum@diabetes.org.uk

What are C peptide levels like in LADA/ adult T1?

Status
This thread is now closed. Please contact Anna DUK, Ieva DUK or everydayupsanddowns if you would like it re-opened.
How many other diseases are described as autoimmune? I have no typical autoimmune issues and although I fit T1 characteristics, in my case the cause is not 'autoimmunity'. Let's stop talking about T1 as an 'autoimmune' disease as such and open our eyes to the wider range of causes of low insulin particularly in later life.

Type 1 by definition is auto-immune though. What you’re describing that you have, would probably be referred to as T1.5 by my consultant because, from your posts, it seems you have some insulin resistance. There are a number of auto-immune conditions. Sometimes the fact that they’re auto-immune isn’t ‘put up front’ so to speak, but they still are, eg coeliac disease and multiple sclerosis.
 
Bearing in mind it's known but largely ignored that viruses can result in beta cell damage why does the profession continue to use the team 'autoimmune'. For late onset is it merely guess-work? How many other diseases are described as autoimmune? I have no typical autoimmune issues and although I fit T1 characteristics, in my case the cause is not 'autoimmunity'. Let's stop talking about T1 as an 'autoimmune' disease as such and open our eyes to the wider range of causes of low insulin particularly in later life.
What do you have against Type 1 being defined as an autoimmune condition?
My understanding is that a virus will kick off the auto-immune response not that the virus directly causes Type 1.
Then there has to be something which stops the beta cells regenerating even if they are killed by a virus. What is that if it is not an auto-immune response?
It is not as if all auto-immune conditions start at birth so they need to have something which "gets them going".

And whilst autoimmune conditions do tend to group together, you can only have one (known) auto-immune condition - for me it is Type 1, for my father it is psoriasis.
 
Did they actually say that you can have (one) antibody and not be t1/LADA? It doesn't seem to say that in the guidelines?

That was more my recollection from the discussions. You might find more if you dig a bit deeper into the ‘from evidence to recommendations’ appendices? Those tend to list the studies that were reviewed, and the way the discussions balanced the eidence that made the ‘PICO’ cut
 
Status
This thread is now closed. Please contact Anna DUK, Ieva DUK or everydayupsanddowns if you would like it re-opened.
Back
Top