Proud to be erratic
Well-Known Member
- Relationship to Diabetes
- Type 3c
- Pronouns
- He/Him
Good question. Personally I thought water would be fine and I also thought a glass of wine would also be fine; but not beer which has carbs that ultimately need to be accounted for. At this early stage keep things simple, however in due course you could (should?) use the structured testing to find out if a glass of wine makes much difference to you - if you are in the habit of having some alcohol with a meal. The confusion creeps in because alcohol can distort BG readings, usually temporarily but not always and the goal right now is to find meals you enjoy and that your body manages to metabolise these satisfactorily.Not even water?
The 2 hour interval is pretty important since it provides consistency in comparing one event to another. It may be that for you the 2 hr point might be the peak of your BG rise from dealing with a meal. But different meals can have different metabolic responses, frequently influenced by the fat content of that meal. For example your meal this evening of stir-fry veg and a salmon fillet cooked in the air fryer was not only naturally low carb, but also very low fat. Hence no appreciable change between start of meal and 2 hrs later. A slice of pizza would be considered carb high and "finger licking" greasy; the fat content would be highly likely to be slowing down your ability to metabolise such a meal.
The fp numbers are displayed to one decimal point, but this is marketing hype; in practice your readings of 6.3 then 6.1 are effectively the same, ie about 6. It is better to mentally round the nos to the nearest whole number and manage your own expectations: great result, no change. 6 at start then 9 after 2 hrs, would be satisfactory at this stage, but also a meal that wouldn't hurt by being tweaked: a few less carbs in the production or a smaller portion on your plate. 6 at meal start then 12 after 2 hrs: not great - rethink that meal choice.
All these test devices and their strips are manufactured to a cost that keeps them widely affordable and the industry standards allow a +/- 15% margin for accuracy. So try not to get too bogged down or concerned by minor variations; there is a lot of science involved in getting results but overall the management of one's BG is more art than science and it helps to stay relaxed about results. This relaxing "concept" also applies to weighing and measuring. It is good to try to be accurate as one goes along, preventing small errors from accumulating and becoming a big error. Kitchen scales may show a weight to the nearest gram, but in practice a single gram is a tiny quantity when isolated on a set of scales and really makes no difference.