It's odd how Doctor Unwin's original diet seems to have propagated as something it never really appeared to be in the first instance.
I do remember the original diet write up.
Is this the module?
"Type 2 diabetes is an increasingly common and progressive disease, the progression of which can sometimes be paused or even reversed using a low glycaemic-index (GI diet). Many patients with type 2 diabetes are on multiple drugs, yet are still not well controlled. This module describes the use of a low GI diet as an adjunct treatment for diabetes, using a case study of a real patient registered at the author's practice. The physiology and evidence behind a low glycaemic-index diet are described, as well as how to implement it in real life."
This seems to be more in line with the original description at the time?
It also seems to suggest it's merely a therapy to be used along side the primary therapy, but I must admit, I've not really seem anything after the initial news reports.
I can't remember any great studies for either that one, or the one you can pay for however, or any follow up studies, or diets suggested afterwards for either?
But personally, I would say a low GI diet did aid me, and is definitely an excellent starting point.
So I would agree, the RCGP seems worth a read, and it appears to be free, always a bonus.