mikeyB
Well-Known Member
- Relationship to Diabetes
- Type 1
I’ve been having a look around the world, not just in America, but also France, Germany, Canada, New Zealand and Australia. None recommend blood monitoring of glucose in T2s not on medication that could cause hypoglycaemia. They use studies that show no improvement in HbA1c in those testing to those simply monitored with 3-6 monthly HbA1c and given advice on weight and diet in both cases. It is studies of that sort that informs the NICE position. These are reputable studies, so not easy to argue against.
The population of this forum is self selected, not a true reflection of the total population with diabetes. I’m not sure, with all our experiences on this forum, that we have sufficient clout to argue against the bean counters en masse. Their evidence is strong. Our evidence is nothing more than anecdotal, from the small group of the total membership who are vocal on the forum.
NICE would cheerfully admit our results are better than average, if we could show that, but they can’t accept evidence from a self selected group with a ready formed opinion to affect their judgement.
And I say all that as a supporter of blood testing for all T2s.
The population of this forum is self selected, not a true reflection of the total population with diabetes. I’m not sure, with all our experiences on this forum, that we have sufficient clout to argue against the bean counters en masse. Their evidence is strong. Our evidence is nothing more than anecdotal, from the small group of the total membership who are vocal on the forum.
NICE would cheerfully admit our results are better than average, if we could show that, but they can’t accept evidence from a self selected group with a ready formed opinion to affect their judgement.
And I say all that as a supporter of blood testing for all T2s.