You're entitled to your opinion, even if it is erroneous...🙄
Evidence-based nutrition guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes, May 2011, from Diabetes UK Nutritional Guidelines
Recommendations
• Weight loss is the most important predictor of risk reduction for Type 2 diabetes. Weight loss of at least 5 to 7 per cent is effective for Type 2 diabetes prevention. (A)
• Lifestyle interventions that incorporate energy restriction, low fat diets and increased physical activity can effectively reduce the risk of Type 2 diabetes in high risk groups. (A)
• There is no evidence for the most effective dietary approach over another to achieve weight loss and prevent Type 2 diabetes. (D)
• Interventions promoting diet alone, increased physical activity alone or a combination of the two is equally effective in reducing risk. (A)
• Dietary patterns characterised by low intakes of saturated fat and higher intakes of unsaturated fat are protective. (B)
• Diets of low glycaemic index/load and higher in dietary fibre and wholegrains are protective. (B)
• Some specific foods (low fat dairy foods, green leafy vegetables, coffee and moderate intakes of alcohol) are associated with reduced risk of Type 2 diabetes. (B) • Other foods (red meats, processed meat products and fried potatoes) are associated with increased risk of Type 2 diabetes. (B)
These recommendations, I understand, are still the current viewpoint of Diabetes UK. Sadly there's is no mention of the link between carbohydrates and diabetes (although the many recent studies make the national press they don't make this website, as far as I can tell) There are also the amazing success stories being achieved in managing or even reversing type 2 diabetes through fasting diets, the Newcastle diet or the LCHF diets that predominate across the internet but not here.
It's great that this website offers moral support but it's a shame it provides little or none information about controlling type 2 diabetes that is burgeoning across the net.
I am not erroneous, just more widely read.