Relying on CGM for hypo awareness while driving

I think it would be unwise not to respond to the box regarding hypo awareness. As it could imply you didn’t get symptoms? Even though I rarely drop that low to get that messed up. I’m still aware of the subtle early warning.
This is the current DIAB1 form https://assets.publishing.service.g...13/diab1-confidential-medical-information.pdf

Question 6 asks if you are aware of the warning signs, ie do you know what they are, not do you get them. Then goes on to ask if you get warning signs - here the first possible response is “never had episodes of low blood glucose” and you move to Qu 7, which asks you to confirm that you will test your BG at times relevant to driving. Otherwise you answer yes or no to the question about warning signs.

I believe that covers all bases
 
I can't remember how the form/question is worded but I know I took a good few moments to read and double read it before I completed it because the wording is not entirely straight forward. Obviously I have had hypos so I know my hypo signs but I still feel that I have to be very careful about how I reply to that. It is probably the key question on the form.

Maybe it should be mandatory for people who want to drive to prove hypo awareness, but to do that you would have to deliberately overdose and that is clearly ethically wrong.

I remember one guy who came to the forum who was newly diagnosed. He had had a hypo during surgery when he was anaesthetised. He was told about it after the surgery. He had not had a hypo other than that, so he ticked to say he had had a hypo but then he had to tick the next question to say that he was unaware of it and of course he lost his licence and he was having a right battle with DVLA to even speak to someone about it let alone get it sorted because there was no way to clarify the situation on the form itself, so he had answered each question literally and truthfully.
 
Thanks for clarifying that @JJay
 
Thank you all for your responses.
I readily admit to being mea culpa for reading driving info and watching videos but totally missing the link to the DVLA leaflet where the info on hypo awareness and CGM's is tucked away inside. However, specialist health professionals in possession of all the facts do indeed have a duty of care in this area.
The debate around the definition of hypo awareness is interesting. For car driving it just has to be "adequate" which means you experience symptoms in time to stop driving safely. If definite symptoms are experienced at low 3/high 2 level, but there is no impairment of function and ability to pull over safely is retained, would that do? I intend to log any symptoms I do experience and link them to sensor readings and finger prick tests and eventually take them to a specialist for an opinion.
I still think a set of safe rules for CGM use could be drawn up, for example:
  • You must have your phone or reader safely mounted and on continuous display.
  • You must set the low glucose alarm to 4.9 before setting off. Pull over and test if it goes off.
  • If there is sensor error or signal loss, you must pull over and test and wait for signal return.
  • If your sensor fails you must either replace and wait for activation, or perhaps set an alarm and test every 30 mins until reaching destination or eat carbs to be sure of running high until reaching destination.
 
If definite symptoms are experienced at low 3/high 2 level, but there is no impairment of function and ability to pull over safely is retained, would that do?
There is usually cognitive impairment below mid 3s and I would say definitely high 2s, but as I said in one of my posts, it may depend on which meter you are using as to whether that meter is reading lower than your actual BG for you.
 
If your sensor fails you must either replace and wait for activation, or perhaps set an alarm and test every 30 mins until reaching destination or eat carbs to be sure of running high until reaching destination
My understanding is that you must carry a finger prick meter with you when driving.
I assume it is for these kind of scenarios.
And, when using finger prick testing, 2 hour tests are sufficient.
If they are insufficient, you could argue that you are back to the discussion about hypo awareness.

It has always surprises me that there are no rules about when you last ate/bolused.
If I am steady at 4.6, no active bolus and eaten in the last 30 minutes, I know I am safer to drive than if I have active bolus, 2 hours since eating and falling arrow with BG of 5.9.
 
If definite symptoms are experienced at low 3/high 2 level, but there is no impairment of function and ability to pull over safely is retained, would that do? I intend to log any symptoms I do experience and link them to sensor readings and finger prick tests and eventually take them to a specialist for an opinion.

My consultant seems unusual in that she always asks me about hypo symptoms and what number I feel them at. Low 3 is far too low to be driving, presuming that’s accurate. 4’s the floor, 5 to drive. Most people would be having unpleasant symptoms in the low 3s. I know I do.
 
This is the current DIAB1 form https://assets.publishing.service.g...13/diab1-confidential-medical-information.pdf

Question 6 asks if you are aware of the warning signs, ie do you know what they are, not do you get them. Then goes on to ask if you get warning signs - here the first possible response is “never had episodes of low blood glucose” and you move to Qu 7, which asks you to confirm that you will test your BG at times relevant to driving. Otherwise you answer yes or no to the question about warning signs.

I believe that covers all bases
Thanks, what I was suggesting was not responding positively to awareness with an acknowledgment on what the signs are, could forfeit the licence. The BG testing is a responsibility we have to agree to. Another possible forfeit if we don’t? I’ve never done otherwise to find out. 😉
 
what I was suggesting was not responding positively to awareness with an acknowledgment on what the signs are, could forfeit the licence
And rightly so. I do wonder how likely is it that anyone prescribed BG-lowering medication would not be told that (a) they may have hypos and (b) what the warning signs of hypos might be?

As others have said, if I have the “warning” signs listed by DVLA, I’m already hypo! My physical warning signs are lightheadedness and slight hunger, but thankfully Libre, via Sweet Dreams and Apple CarPlay, alerts me way before then.
 
And rightly so. I do wonder how likely is it that anyone prescribed BG-lowering medication would not be told that (a) they may have hypos and (b) what the warning signs of hypos might be?

As others have said, if I have the “warning” signs listed by DVLA, I’m already hypo! My physical warning signs are lightheadedness and slight hunger, but thankfully Libre, via Sweet Dreams and Apple CarPlay, alerts me way before then.
I’ve had it reiterated over the decades from professionals, especially when I’ve achieved HbA1s lower than the target at the time? “Oh, you must be having lots of hypos.” “Are you feeling hypo symptoms?” I’ve had no more than usual & always managed to corner them so they are less severe. But given the general advice on what to look out for with a “hypo.” I do wonder if some in the past (prior to CGMs) have let things go too far down the line before treating? I’ll hold my hands up & say I couldn’t perform complex tasks if I allowed myself to experience what the “textbook” symptoms of a hypo is. (Other than snaffling fast acting carbs.)
 
This is the current (Aug 2024) up to date DVLA fitness to drive document.

This explains 'every' condition etc, not just diabetes. I came across this due to an article in the 'Telegraph', about general fitness to drive, for elderly people, or those with a medical condition.


I thought it might be interesting for others, and also those that take other medication, and the possible driving requirements/restrictions.

So, looking at this document, as I'm new to diabetes (8 weeks) and have not suffered a 'hypo', I can't drive?

I Will not be allowed a licence, until I do suffer or know the symptoms of a 'hypo'?

What if I never have a hypo, because I always run 'high', does that mean I'll never be allowed to drive again?

I've already notified DVLA, I'm an insulin diabetic, and have had my licence restricted to 3 years.

Whilst I'd agree that if an alarm went off to alert you that your close to being 'hypo' shouldn't happen, being able to see your bg readings constantly maybe shouldn't require a finger prick (fp) check every two hours?

Having read some of the above document, 'technically' I'm not permitted to drive as I'm also dependent on codeine, as a medication.
 
Last edited:
So, looking at this document, as I'm new to diabetes (8 weeks) and have not suffered a 'hypo', I can't drive?

I Will not be allowed a licence, until I do suffer or know the symptoms of a 'hypo'?

What if I never have a hypo, because I always run 'high', does that mean I'll never be allowed to drive again?

I've already notified DVLA, I'm an insulin diabetic, and have had my licence restricted to 3 years.

That isn’t the way I understand the form and guidance.

You should be able to tick ‘No’ to show you haven’t had hypos, but also that you are aware of the warning signs that you need to look out for?

I don’t think the DVLA want you to deliberately give yourself a hypo just to satisfy their form!
 
So, looking at this document, as I'm new to diabetes (8 weeks) and have not suffered a 'hypo', I can't drive?
If you’re new to diabetes you really should have experienced the feelings of a hypo. You don’t need a bg below 4 to know you get hypo symptoms. You should get the symptoms far earlier when first starting insulin and bring down high bg levels.
 
Back
Top