• Please Remember: Members are only permitted to share their own experiences. Members are not qualified to give medical advice. Additionally, everyone manages their health differently. Please be respectful of other people's opinions about their own diabetes management.
  • Screening for type 1 diabetes: We now have a new forum section which is for parents who, after having their child screened for type 1, have received a positive result that at some stage their child will be diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Where possible, please do offer your support and experiences of having a child diagnosed. https://forum.diabetes.org.uk/boards/forums/screening-for-type-1-community-chat.59/

Pre-diabetes aged 16 - advise please

Yes. Not only is it not necessary, it inadvertently plays into the commonly repeated myth that Type 1 is caused by sugar. When I was a young child of about 4yrs old, a woman told me off for eating a sugar lump and said that I’d get diabetes. Then, after getting Type 1 - which was nothing to do with eating sugar lumps!! - another person told me I must have eaten too many sweets 🙄

To be clear, Type 1 is an auto-immune condition.

Good luck @SJR Let us know how things go.
What a silly thing to say to a child.
And yes, I'm aware that T1 is an auto-immune condition.
At the moment until further medical testing determines any issues he has been diagnosed with pre T2
 
What a silly thing to say to a child.
And yes, I'm aware that T1 is an auto-immune condition.
At the moment until further medical testing determines any issues he has been diagnosed with pre T2

The ‘auto-immune’ bit wasn’t aimed at you @Pollyanna 🙂 It was aimed at the two people who spoke to me and everyone else who has swallowed that myth.
 
Thanks yes - deep breaths! I do have knowledge of type 1 and devices as I work in marketing - working with pharma companies/HCPs launching CGM etc. but no experience on a personal level. He had problems swallowing last year so had thyroid tests, they thought it was thyroid inflammation due to infection but never really decided. We asked for another blood test as a first step to prehaps find out why he feels so cold all the time and purple hands (Reynaulds?) plus he seems have have low immunity and always got a cold/cough, not growing much etc. Hoping it's maybe hormones and exam pressures but I'm someone who likes to know every fact out there so gathering information. I did think about getting some finger prick tests done to monitor while we await GP appointment
There is some evidence that the HbA1C may not be the best test for children and young people as there may be other factors coming into play over the 3 months that the test would reflect and in those circumstances though not used normally for diagnosis an OGTT (oral glucose tolerance test) may give a better indication of the body's ability to handle carbohydrates. It usually involves a fasting blood glucose test and then drinking a fixed amount of a glucose drink and then a sample taken after usually 2 hours, with no physical activity during the wait.
It would be worth asking your GP about that.
I know growing kids usually eat a fair amount but making sure there are healthy options available and any drinks are not sugary. If kids are into sports then they are often fairly clued up on the need for good nutrition or at least we hope they are.
 
What a silly thing to say to a child.
And yes, I'm aware that T1 is an auto-immune condition.
At the moment until further medical testing determines any issues he has been diagnosed with pre T2
There is no test to determine "pre Type 2 diabetes" just pre-diabetes because the HbA1c test result just indicates normal, pre-diabetes or diabetes and nothing about the type/cause of that diabetes. If someone is in the prediabetes range they might be at risk of developing Type 1, Type 2, Type 3c, MODY, LADA etc.
It is important to keep an open mind about type and something doctors can be guilty of failing to do.
 
There is no test to determine "pre Type 2 diabetes" just pre-diabetes because the HbA1c test result just indicates normal, pre-diabetes or diabetes and nothing about the type/cause of that diabetes. If someone is in the prediabetes range they might be at risk of developing Type 1, Type 2, Type 3c, MODY, LADA etc.
It is important to keep an open mind about type and something doctors can be guilty of failing to do.

I wonder if the doctor was using the term pre-diabetes as a kind of ‘very close to the diabetes level’ rather than at risk of Type 2?

The vast majority of diabetes diagnosis in children and teens are Type 1 - around 90% or more.
 
Back
Top