Ha, at last I've found an up-to-date paper
http://dst.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/02/26/1932296814523882.full
including this gem of a paragraph (IIS = Insulin Infusion Sets) :
Length of use recommendations for IIS is generally 2 days for steel sets and 3 days for Teflon sets, although we are unable to find any data supporting these recommendations and at least one study found no difference.
I'm afraid the NHS is ripped off left, right and centre by pharmaceutical co.s, powerful lobbyists, undeclared interests, clever marketing, distorted and hidden trial results.....I'm not saying it is in this case, but I don't take anything at face value when I know the potential forces at play
😉 🙂
All I was really asking was whether anyone here knows what these 2 different recommendations for set change (teflon vs steel) are based on exactly, and what evidence there is for it (the difference)? As it stands, the different pump co.s recommend different lengths of time for both tubing and cartridge changes (at least Animas and Roche do, don't know about the others), presumably based on the same research evidence!
I know in the end we also have to find out what works best for us, within the information we are given, or can access. But I would hope the starting point is based on sound well-researched evidence, and there just doesn't seem to be any regarding more frequent change of steel cannulas!!
Gah....brain in overdrive. Thanks anyway for your input and thoughts
🙂