I don’t think I view that as a cynical way of structuring the study to skew the results though. Even
if it was a deliberately chosen starting point to evaluate a hypothesis. The ‘accompanying commentary’ linked here is behind a paywall, which is annoying, but it does look like even early on in 2019 the findings were considered by some to be possibly applicable to a number of candidates who have a longer duration of diabetes.
The findings have been simultaneously published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, in which Paul Aveyard (University of Oxford, UK) and co-authors of an accompanying commentary suggest that the DiRECT results might apply more widely, such as to people with a longer duration of diabetes, and that even greater weight loss could further increase the chances of diabetes remission.
Journals, news and training, tailored for doctors specialized in preventing and treating the various types of diabetes and their secondary complications.
diabetes.medicinematters.com
This was a few years back - I’m not sure what has emerged in the interim.
At the end of the day I see it as promising and encouraging research, and I’m pleased that we have some members here who have used some aspects of the trial intervention for themselves with positive results for them.
It’s not intended to be a silver bullet that works for everyone, any more than any of the options that folks on the forum use to good effect for their own diabetes management are - but I’m glad it is an option that works for some people
🙂
It’s a bit like the ‘cures’ for T1 which are beginning to break new ground. I would love those studies to continue and to be able to publish data with positive outcomes for a proportion of people within a few years of a T1 diagnosis - even though I’ve had T1 far too long for any of that to apply to me. I still want it for other people - even if it’s only a
tiny minority 🙂