• Please Remember: Members are only permitted to share their own experiences. Members are not qualified to give medical advice. Additionally, everyone manages their health differently. Please be respectful of other people's opinions about their own diabetes management.
  • We seem to be having technical difficulties with new user accounts. If you are trying to register please check your Spam or Junk folder for your confirmation email. If you still haven't received a confirmation email, please reach out to our support inbox: support.forum@diabetes.org.uk

Nova and apidra

Status
This thread is now closed. Please contact Anna DUK, Ieva DUK or everydayupsanddowns if you would like it re-opened.

bennyg70

Well-Known Member
Relationship to Diabetes
Type 1
I know I keep going on about this, but I really do value your opnions, far more than I will my DSNs.

Ive looked in my book and spent some time totting up some results between a similar time period of been back on nova, and when i was using apidra.

During 1 day of the apidra period there was some fasting involved so possible unrelated info included. However based on the amount of tests I dont think it really bears a big impact.

I wont name each insulin, Ill just call them X & Y

Which would you choose to be working with from now on if you were in my situation?

Breakfast:
X - 19 results / Average - 6.81mmol/l / 1 High above 10mmol, 2 lo Between 3.5 - 4mmol

Y - 19 results / Average - 7.56mmol/l / 4 High above 10mmol, 2 Lo Between 3 - 4 mmol

After Breakfast
X - 11 results / Average - 7.49mmol/l / 1 High above 10mmol
Y - 11 results / Average - 7.59mmol/l / 1 High above 10mmol, 1 Lo

Lunch
X - 16 results / Average - 6.05mmol/l / 2 low between 3.5 - 4
Y - 16 results / Average - 7.55mmol/l / 3 High above 10mmol, 2 Lo under 3.5

2 Hours after lunch
X - 15 results / Average - 7.2mmol/l / 2 High above 10mmol
Y - 15 results / Average - 7.13mmol/l / 2 High above 10mmol, 7 Lo below 4, 1 lo below 3

Dinner
X - 18 results / Average - 7.41mmol/l / 1 low between 3 - 3.5
Y - 18 results / Average - 6.16mmol/l / 1 high over 10mmol

2 Hours after dinner
X - 14 results / Average - 7.64mmol/l / 1 lo 3 - 3.5, 2 results 4 - 5mmol, 4 high 10 - 12mmol.
Y - 14 results / Average - 6.4 mmol/l / 3 lows below 3.5

Bed readings
X - 14 results / Average - 6.47mmol/l / 1 High @ 10.7mmol, 4 readings 4 - 5mmol
Y - 14 results / Average - 7.65mmol/l / 2 High above 10mmol, 2 readings 4 - 5mmol

During night
X - 2 results @ 4 - 8, 1 low result
Y - 2 results @ 10 + , 1 Low result

Sorry I know its a lot of information and a lot to take in.. Hoping to hear your opinions... Althoguh some of the averages look good, there can be a fair bit of variation in the results to come to the good average, believe me I dont run at 6.5mmol everyday for say lunch through a month, its more like 4 one day, 8 the next, 6 the next, 9 the next, 3 the next, so on and so on....

Thanks

Ben
 
Last edited:
Hi Ben,

Those results look very good...X or Y....not a lot of difference and maybe more results needed to gain a more reliable result? I used to use Humalog on MDI and was then changed to Novo Rapid on my pump, have to say I haven't noticed any difference really....sorry I couldn't offer more help
 
I'd have X in the morning and Y in the afternoon:D There doesn't seem to be a great deal in it but the X seems to give fewer Highs and Lows.
 
X seems to be more stable - although Y does have some slightly lower averages, once you take meter error into account they're irrelevent.

I would say you definitely need to look at reworking your ratios though - all your averages are a little on the high side. Ideally for all of these you should be in the 4-6 range.
 
X seems to be more stable - although Y does have some slightly lower averages, once you take meter error into account they're irrelevent.

I would say you definitely need to look at reworking your ratios though - all your averages are a little on the high side. Ideally for all of these you should be in the 4-6 range.

....I take my hat off to you if you are always in the 4-6 range!
 
Always working to improve, and maybe one day Ill get there (4 - 6), but it looks unlikely in the near future. Id just like to get them stabler (If thats a word) for now. I guarentee those numbers would have read in the 8s and 9s over the last few years.

Id like to get to constant 4 -8s with the odd minor blip, before looking at lowering the overall average. Ie Id rather see a average of 7, with 100s of 7s in my book, so a low standard deviation, working towards just lowering my average to begin with.

Im pretty happy with them. But you have to aim high
 
Last edited:
....I take my hat off to you if you are always in the 4-6 range!

Knowing the path, and walking it, are two completely different things 😱

Id like to get to constant 4 -8s with the odd minor blip, before looking at lowering the overall average. Ie Id rather see a average of 7, with 100s of 7s in my book, so a low standard deviation, working towards just lowering my average to begin with.

Absolutely. And on those grounds, insulin X definitely looks the better option.
 
Thanks for the feedback

X was the Novarapid. And I do think its the one to work with for me!
 
Awww you've gone and revelaed before I read the thread!

I was going to say X too - with a little bit of work around eve mealtime.

Both sets of results are pretty good, but if you can keep the reduced variation goimg longterm you'll be onto a winner!

M
 
Ahhh sorry!! I just couldnt hold it in any longer!!
 
LOL - X was obviously The One as soon as I read your post Benny.

Apart from evening meal but that might be to do with basal running out, mightn't it? If it isn't then you need a different carb ratio then. Or for some types of food, or in consideration of exercise yesterday or the weather or what happened at work at lunchtime - or whatever ...... it's all a bit debatable on just that info!
 
Def agree those are the areas I need to work on. Its kind of strange really.

Although ill have a good to OK result 2 hours post lunch, Ill sometimes get a higher reading toward dinner than the 2 hours after lunch one. I thought doing a basal test would highlight a rise at this time, but it didnt!!

However I think I made a break through, I dont think my Nova lasts as long between 12 & 4, and burns out after 2 - 2.5 hours. What was happening was if I saw a result say 5 or 6 mmol/l 2 hours post lunch, Id have a small snack as I thoguht I was heading too loopy la la low land. However Ive tried a couple of times now taking my result at 2 hours post lunch and the following hour & dinner time and they were identicle. So I was inflicting this rise on myself.

The reason id do this was because with apidra I could guarentee Id be 2mmol/l lower at dinner than my post 2 hour reading. But not so with Nova.

More testing needed to confirm I hold and that the nova burns out after 2 hours
 
More testing needed to confirm I hold and that the nova burns out after 2 hours

Or that the remaining lunch is digesting at exactly the right rate to hold you level. I havent researched extensively, but my feeling rthe last time I looked was that 2hrs was not enough time to completely finish digesting a meal.
 
Status
This thread is now closed. Please contact Anna DUK, Ieva DUK or everydayupsanddowns if you would like it re-opened.
Back
Top