• Please Remember: Members are only permitted to share their own experiences. Members are not qualified to give medical advice. Additionally, everyone manages their health differently. Please be respectful of other people's opinions about their own diabetes management.
  • We seem to be having technical difficulties with new user accounts. If you are trying to register please check your Spam or Junk folder for your confirmation email. If you still haven't received a confirmation email, please reach out to our support inbox: support.forum@diabetes.org.uk

Non-invasive glucose monitor closer to market

Status
This thread is now closed. Please contact Anna DUK, Ieva DUK or everydayupsanddowns if you would like it re-opened.

redrevis

Well-Known Member
Relationship to Diabetes
Type 1
Could this be the end of expensive strips? As much testing as you want no matter what type you are?
http://blogs.umsl.edu/news/2011/03/29/glucose/

People with diabetes could soon have a pain-free way to check their blood glucose levels. Researchers at the University of Missouri–St. Louis have developed a portable, inexpensive non-invasive blood glucose detector; the university has licensed patent rights for the device to St. Louis Medical Devices, Inc., a Missouri company headquartered at UMSL’s own startup company incubator – IT Enterprises, to bring the device to market.


The small monitor will allow for pain-free, convenient detection of glucose levels in capillaries of the finger with no waste (strips, lancets, etc.) and no need to draw blood. It tests blood characteristics by shining near-infrared light through the finger, detecting the light transmitted through the targeted area, and generating an output signal. A processor receives the output signals, calculates a change in the magnitude of light power transmitted through the finger and determines a characteristic of blood – in this case glucose. Future applications of the device could include other blood analytes such as cholesterol.


“Unlike other non-invasive monitors in development, this technology provides for detection in just one second; it’s portable, accurate and inexpensive; it measures glucose in blood rather than interstitial fluid without the need to average multiple readings; and it does not require any moving parts,” Xu said. “There have been 25 years of attempts to create such a non-invasive glucose monitor. I think we’ve done it.”


What's the saying if something looks to good to be true...

(maybe I'm just synical😛)
 
Just wait for all those 'depressed' people who test all the time to flood the NHS, there will be a boom in anti-D's! 🙄

(not and not)

Andy 🙂
 
Well, too good or not.....Here's keeping MY fingers crossed, looks good to me...
 
Just think, no more bleeding fingers! I can't wait.
 
Sadly, I've tended to get cynical after so many years of reading about breakthroughs.

They tend to improve existing technology, rather than introduce new.

But it would be nice.🙂

Rob
 
Sadly, I've tended to get cynical after so many years of reading about breakthroughs.

They tend to improve existing technology, rather than introduce new.

But it would be nice.🙂

Rob

Couldn't agree more - I'm the biggest cynic there is when it comes to so called new technology!
 
This one is British, based in Reading. It was briefly mentioned on the BBC a couple of weeks ago. They have a small group fo people trialling it.
http://www.lein-ad.com/glucose_monitoring.shtml
If it works though they'll need investment to get it onto the market and that seems to be where a lot of these innovations fall down.
 
Hmm testing using the eye sounds a bit dodgy to me. As it's a new device, no way to know if it's damaging your eyes or not:confused:
 
I think it's using refraction to determine the density of fluid, in the eye using a low powered light, a bit like some of the instruments opthamologists use.
 
I just about trust my pump and current meter. Being a massive cynic and being able to recall at least one such similar story from a good decade ago I just don't think it'll happen. I've heard similar tales about dyes and microchips inserted in your eyes, tatoos with a similar purpose. The one from a decade or so ago was a watch that could do it. I have long since given up hope on such a thing.
 
Status
This thread is now closed. Please contact Anna DUK, Ieva DUK or everydayupsanddowns if you would like it re-opened.
Back
Top