• Please Remember: Members are only permitted to share their own experiences. Members are not qualified to give medical advice. Additionally, everyone manages their health differently. Please be respectful of other people's opinions about their own diabetes management.
  • We seem to be having technical difficulties with new user accounts. If you are trying to register please check your Spam or Junk folder for your confirmation email. If you still haven't received a confirmation email, please reach out to our support inbox: support.forum@diabetes.org.uk

My Recent Experience at Stansted Airport

YvonneB

New Member
Relationship to Diabetes
Type 1
Pronouns
She/Her
Hi all, first time poster here so apologies if my post doesn’t match any normal convention, but I wanted to highlight a recent experience I had at Stansted Airport which has put me off using this airport going forward.

Quick context: I’ve had Type 1 for almost 30 years, been using the Freestyle Libre for about 7 years and switched over to pump therapy (Omnipod 5) 4 months ago. During my Omnipod training, I was made aware that the Libre cannot go through the big new airport scanners.

I’ve done 2 domestic trips to London since finding out this information. In the security area of Glasgow and Heathrow airports, a member of staff has simply swabbed my pod and done a quick patdown in the same way as if someone set off the metal detectors in the olden days. Sometimes they put my shoes through the luggage scanner, but no major inconvenience.

I travelled back via Stansted earlier this month. Expecting the same process, I informed the person at the scanner that my sensor can’t go through the scanner and asked for a manual search. She said she would call for someone. I then had to stand at the side of the gate for approximately 15 minutes while every other passenger wandered past me to go through the scanner, many gesturing for me to go ahead as they thought I was waiting, and the security official informing them that I was waiting for something. My luggage went through and was sat at the other end while I waited.

Eventually, someone came to get me and I realised why it took so long. I was escorted by 2 female staff members into a private room (while my luggage still sat in the retrieval area) to carry out a private search. They explained the search to me (slightly more invasive than the ones at other airports but nothing that required taking me off to a private room in front of thousands of passengers) and did what they needed to. I asked them why this was necessary and explained what happened at every other airport I’ve visited - one of the staff advised that they have asked about this but they’ve been told they’re not allowed to do these searches on the floor.

I was then escorted over to the luggage retrieval area (where thankfully my boyfriend had been keeping an eye on my belongings with no idea where I had gone - who knows who could have swiped them if I was travelling solo) and had to give them my passport number and boarding pass information before I was able to continue my journey.

Having diabetes comes with many challenges, but I can honestly say I’ve never been treated differently by anyone up to this point. The staff were professional and not rude at all - it’s not their fault, but whatever process Stansted have in place needs an urgent review. I felt embarrassed, as though I had done something wrong, and I was quite tearful afterwards.

Just wanted to share in case anyone else flies from Stansted Airport (in which case, I hope you have a better experience than I did!) I will be writing a complaint to Stansted as well so that I can try to ensure this gets reviewed.
 
It’s a tough one, for airports. Had they been rude, I’d have been up in arms. Certainty the wait while they found someone, with your belongings left potentially unattended, needs addressing.
But unfortunately, one day, if their security isn’t as tight as possible, a terrorist will use a medical device to distract from the fact they’re also carrying something nasty, knowing they won’t be thoroughly searched.
 
So your complaint is that you were searched, at your request as an alternative to the scanners, and that you had to wait for same sex staff to be available to carry the search out in private for your own benefit, and then you had to provide your travel documents which is entirely expected in an airport?

Not a clue what you’re upset with there
 
It’s a tough one, for airports. Had they been rude, I’d have been up in arms. Certainty the wait while they found someone, with your belongings left potentially unattended, needs addressing.
But unfortunately, one day, if their security isn’t as tight as possible, a terrorist will use a medical device to distract from the fact they’re also carrying something nasty, knowing they won’t be thoroughly searched.
I have no issue at all with being searched, I’d be much more concerned if they didn’t - I’m just not sure why they can’t just search me in the same way as they need to carry out additional searches on other people like they do in the other airports I’ve visited. Surely there should be one process across all airports.
 
I’m just not sure why they can’t just search me in the same way as they need to carry out additional searches on other people like they do in the other airports I’ve visited
It’s an intimate search, they have to feel your entire body, in a seperate room gives you more privacy and they had two members of staff for your safety. What actually harmed you having it done in private?

It’s like if you were complaining that your medical appointment took place in the private doctors room and not in the waiting area.
 
So your complaint is that you were searched, at your request as an alternative to the scanners, and that you had to wait for same sex staff to be available to carry the search out in private for your own benefit, and then you had to provide your travel documents which is entirely expected in an airport?

Not a clue what you’re upset with there
In every other airport I’ve visited so far, the female staff member attending to the scanner just waves me through and does the search on the floor without any need for private rooms, the spectacle of being escorted to one without being told what was happening, or the need to provide my details to anyone. If someone wants a private search, then they should absolutely request one. I don’t feel that it’s required - or if it’s deemed that it is, then it should be uniform across all airports and the process should be made clear so that we know what to expect.
 
the spectacle of being escorted to one without being told what was happening
You asked for a search, they escorted you to a room, surely fairly clear that it was for the search you requested? You say it was a spectacle, did the public all start shouting at you or something or were they just getting on with their own security screening.

or the need to provide my details to anyone
In an airport waiting for a flight you should absolutely expect to provide your details to any staff member requesting them, for all of our safety. If you want to travel without providing any of your details, get a train or a bus and stay in the uk
 
You asked for a search, they escorted you to a room, surely fairly clear that it was for the search you requested? You say it was a spectacle, did the public all start shouting at you or something or were they just getting on with their own security screening.


In an airport waiting for a flight you should absolutely expect to provide your details to any staff member requesting them, for all of our safety. If you want to travel without providing any of your details, get a train or a bus and stay in the uk
Clearly we have very different opinions on the subject. I just wanted to share an experience that I found to be unpleasant and upsetting in case others encountered the same, and I don’t appreciate your tone. I won’t be engaging further. I wish you well.
 
Hi Yvonne, thank you so much for taking the time to share your experience and I’m really sorry you had to go through such an upsetting and disorienting situation. Travelling can be stressful at the best of times, and to be left waiting in limbo while separated from your belongings, unsure of what’s happening, must have been incredibly anxiety-inducing.
Sadly, as you touched on, many airports in the UK are privately operated, and procedures can vary widely - even between major hubs. Add in high staff turnover, inconsistent training, and the ever-evolving nature of diabetes tech, and you’ve got a perfect recipe for gaps in understanding and inconsistent practices. What’s even more frustrating is how unnecessary that level of disruption was, especially when other airports are managing this more efficiently.
You’re absolutely right to submit a complaint. Even if the staff were professional in their conduct, the process might need review. At the very least, asking Stansted for clarity around their current policy could open a conversation. It’s also worth copying in the airline you flew with, as they often liaise with airports and might help nudge things along. With the number of people now using CGMs, pumps, and hybrid closed loop systems, airports must catch up - and quickly.
Thank you again for flagging this. It’s such a helpful heads-up for others flying through Stansted, and the more these issues are spoken about, the harder they become to ignore.
 
Hi Yvonne, thank you so much for taking the time to share your experience and I’m really sorry you had to go through such an upsetting and disorienting situation. Travelling can be stressful at the best of times, and to be left waiting in limbo while separated from your belongings, unsure of what’s happening, must have been incredibly anxiety-inducing.
Sadly, as you touched on, many airports in the UK are privately operated, and procedures can vary widely - even between major hubs. Add in high staff turnover, inconsistent training, and the ever-evolving nature of diabetes tech, and you’ve got a perfect recipe for gaps in understanding and inconsistent practices. What’s even more frustrating is how unnecessary that level of disruption was, especially when other airports are managing this more efficiently.
You’re absolutely right to submit a complaint. Even if the staff were professional in their conduct, the process might need review. At the very least, asking Stansted for clarity around their current policy could open a conversation. It’s also worth copying in the airline you flew with, as they often liaise with airports and might help nudge things along. With the number of people now using CGMs, pumps, and hybrid closed loop systems, airports must catch up - and quickly.
Thank you again for flagging this. It’s such a helpful heads-up for others flying through Stansted, and the more these issues are spoken about, the harder they become to ignore.
Thank you so much for your comment, Ieva. I’ll definitely follow up with Stansted - the more we can educate them (and everyone) the better.
 
Thank you so much for your comment, Ieva. I’ll definitely follow up with Stansted - the more we can educate them (and everyone) the better.
I don’t think “searches must only take place in public” is something they need educating on. Yes in many airports they have to be in public but where an airport has the facilities to do these privately that’s great. Nothing to complain or educate about!!
 
I have no issue at all with being searched, I’d be much more concerned if they didn’t - I’m just not sure why they can’t just search me in the same way as they need to carry out additional searches on other people like they do in the other airports I’ve visited. Surely there should be one process across all airports.

I completely understand @YvonneB I too tell airport staff I can’t go through the scanners and I ask to have a pat down and that handheld thing they wave about. I’ve always had this done just a few steps away from the normal queue, which has allowed me to keep an eye on my stuff. It’s not an intimate search and all clothes are on. Unless someone specifically requests privacy for this, then there’s no need to be taken elsewhere.

Why not write to Stanstead and mention your experiences elsewhere? Don’t do it as a complaint but more as a suggestion, and explain your reasons.
 
I don’t think “searches must only take place in public” is something they need educating on. Yes in many airports they have to be in public but where an airport has the facilities to do these privately that’s great. Nothing to complain or educate about!!

Yes, there is if you actually don’t want to be taken away unnecessarily. Some people might want to so there should be that option, but the majority will be fine having the pat down done in public.
 
I don’t think “searches must only take place in public” is something they need educating on. Yes in many airports they have to be in public but where an airport has the facilities to do these privately that’s great. Nothing to complain or educate about!!
Even if the rules are set in stone, there’s still so much value in how those rules are communicated. A quick explanation like “here’s what’s about to happen,” “are you travelling alone?” or “has your luggage already gone through?” can make all the difference in how someone experiences the process - especially when diabetes kit and medical needs are involved. It’s not always about changing the procedure, but about helping people feel informed, safe, and respected.

As @Inka nicely put it, sometimes it’s less about complaining or challenging the policy and more about starting a conversation. Even if the outcome is, “this is just how it’s done here,” at least people can make informed decisions about whether or not to travel through that airport again. (Speaking from personal experience, I’ve got a mental “avoid if possible” list of airports based on repeat issues and I’m sure I’m not alone...)

I totally get not wanting to be seen as ‘making a fuss’ - I used to be the type who wouldn’t even correct a wrong food order. But over time, I’ve come to see that giving feedback, when done kindly and constructively, is not just valid but actually helpful. It can be what sparks change - even if slowly - especially in areas like accessibility and medical needs where one-size-fits-all doesn’t always fit. Nowadays most organisations and companies have people employed for that specific purpose, so it's not like you're making someone 'go away from their duties' to speak to you about it.

So yes, 100% support to anyone who wants to raise these things or just share their experience - it helps others and keeps the dialogue moving forward.
 
Me and my pumps have been through many airports around the world.
On a few occasions, I have had to be forceful about not going through the scanner and I am sure the security staff have lied to me about the safety: “my wife has a pump and always goes through the scanner with no trouble.” But I have only had one situation similar to yours, @YvonneB .
This was at Heathrow which I had used before and since. Like you, I had to wait for a long time and then I was taken into a room feeling like a criminal. The only difference was that I was allowed to take my luggage but I was not allowed to put laptop, etc. away and I was not allowed to put my shoes on.
Actually, the other difference was that the staff were not polite. They were not directly rude but they were very forceful when I tried to pack my bag and very direct when I asked if I could at least put my shoes on,
Yes, they did receive a letter of complaint rather than a suggestion. The reply was an apology and they told me that they would improve their training. To their credit, I have travelled through Heathrow many times since (already 3 times this year) and never had any further issues.
 
What a terrible experience you had at Stansted Airport, @YvonneB. I hope your suggestions will be well received by the airport management.

[Update: comments deleted due to new information]

Even if the rules are set in stone, there’s still so much value in how those rules are communicated.

Communication is a two way process.

My takeaways from this thread are:
- Make sure I say exactly what I mean such as I am wearing a continuous glucose monitor here on my left arm for medical reasons. It can't go through the scanner. What is the procedure?
-
Never expect people to do what I would have thought they would do.

All's well that ends well.
 
Last edited:
As @Inka nicely put it, sometimes it’s less about complaining or challenging the policy and more about starting a conversation. Even if the outcome is, “this is just how it’s done here,” at least people can make informed decisions about whether or not to travel through that airport again. (Speaking from personal experience, I’ve got a mental “avoid if possible” list of airports based on repeat issues and I’m sure I’m not alone...)
Please don't expect an airport to divulge their procedures to the travelling public in all scenarios on demand.

I get where you are coming from, but you'd be surprised what information terrorists can glean from seemingly innocuous conversations. Screens at security and immigration are pointed away from you for a reason.
 
One key component about manging security and policing in general is that there must not be a "written formula" for how it should be implemented. If there is a manual, then you can be sure that a well-organised villain or terrorist will have read that manual and identified possible loopholes. By having uncertainty in the detailed implementation adds to the perception of risk by the woukd-be offender. We have plain clothes for policemen and unmarked police cars; no-one is really surprised about that. No air traveller should be surprised that a previous experience is done differently the next time.

Further, people implementing security procedures would normally have training that included looking out for indicators in behaviour or reaction, when an individual is taken slightly by surprise.

So @Ieva DUK the communication that security measures are in place in abundance in airport. The details of how, will not and should not be widely promulgated! Security necessarily includes secrecy.

@YvonneB, you really shouldn't feel too aggrieved about it all. By your own comments courtesy was shown, by people who have extremely responsible, difficult and stressful jobs and if it delayed you for 15 mins, that's not such a big deal when it comes to air travel. [Time to Spare - Go by Air!]. In this event your partner was there to look after your luggage while you were elsewhere; if your luggage had been completely unattended I suspect you could have explained that and the security people would most definitely taken note - after all unattended luggage is one of the main security worries. I would not be surprised if your luggage and your partner were both on CCTV , with someone looking out for possible behaviour change by your partner! The whole event could also have been a training moment for new airport security personnel; new staff need to encounter real circumstances, ideally in a benign environment!
A polite letter, putting your concerns may be helpful to the Stansted security management; for example they might take into account that a traveller could be concerned about their luggage going adrift while that traveller goes somewhere else to be searched and thus consider a future protocol for that scenario. Chances are if there are protocol adjustments, you will never be told what!
 
I asked for a manual search the first time I travelled with a libre. I actually wrote a letter in Spanish to explain (plane from Madrid) They had no idea what the sensor was and messed about for ages. Since then, I’ve read they’re fine going through the normal scanners, so that’s what I do. Done this 4 or 5 times, it’s never affected the sensors
 
I asked for a manual search the first time I travelled with a libre. I actually wrote a letter in Spanish to explain (plane from Madrid) They had no idea what the sensor was and messed about for ages. Since then, I’ve read they’re fine going through the normal scanners, so that’s what I do. Done this 4 or 5 times, it’s never affected the sensors
I’ve always just gone through the scanners, including one of the new style ones at Gatwick the other month, my sensor only had a couple of days to go, so it wouldn’t have been the end of the world if it had broken, so I thought I may as well try it out. It was fine.
 
Back
Top