Absolutely this
@everydayupsanddowns I too thought ‘lower was better’ and it was ok as long as you kept an eye on things, but it was what I read online about subtle (or not so subtle) cognitive difficulties and heart arrhythmias that made me realise that that wasn’t true. Also, after 20 odd years of Type 1, I felt a ‘softening’ of my hypo symptoms. It was subtle but once I spotted it, it caused me concern. Now, 30 years after diagnosis, my hypo symptoms are still sharp and I always try to stay above 4.8/5 ish as a matter of routine.
Just like weight, lower isn’t better, and if you run too low, you risk developing other problems and affecting your life for the worst. I actually asked my consultant about complications when my HbA1C rose slightly. I asked if someone with an HbA1C of 45 was more at risk of complications than someone with an HbA1C of 45. She said No. Although good control is important, like maintaining a healthy BMI, the healthy zone isn’t at the very bottom - because it brings other risks. That is, a BMI of 21 is good, but a BMI of 16 isn’t ‘extra good’ - it’s more dangerous and it’s unnecessary as it won’t bring better health than a BMI of 21.
It’s the same with HbA1Cs
@sharp00782 I remember the urge to ‘get the best score’ and to force it lower, but that’s not necessary; not healthy; and will impair your hypo awareness, as you’ve found. You also mentioned not eating enough carbs to treat a hypo (ie you didn’t eat enough to bring your blood sugar up enough). That’s another risk that we face: restricted eating and eating disorders. Those can creep up on you and are best nipped in the bud.