I believe that the majority of people with diabetes are classed as type 2. I would imagine that the reletive proportions on here would tend more towards type 1.
The reason (I believe) this would be the case is that as treatment for type 1 is (generally) more involved, it is much more of a daily concern to them.
Yes, both are as dangerous each other, but I think the general perception is that type 1 is more immediate*.
Personally, I don't like the type 1 / type 2 moniker, but is can be useful in talking about generallities. I believe that diabetes is more of a symptom of lots of other diseases / conditions, e.g. pancreatitus.
There should be no 'goal scoring'. It's all just about getting on with whatever effects this 'symptom' has on us.
*Type 1s are more likey to be hospitalised/treated for rapid effects such as hypos or DKA. Type 2s are more likely to suffer from slower, long term complications.