I don't think it's 'low carb' as such (there still aren't really agreed definitions to such things) - it seems to be 'eat to your meter'. For some people this will be quite low levels of carb, and some will opt for LCHF to increase satiety and maintain weight, but the general advice I see here is 'use a BG meter to find out which carbs and how much your individual body can cope with, then eat that'.
It's just that when members do that they tend to reduce their carbs a bit to keep BGs in line (certainly compared to RDA suggestions of 250-300g/day) - whether they are T2 on D&E or T1 on insulin.
Personally I don't think of myself as low carb at all (certainly not with the takeaway we had yesterday!), but I have reduced the carb load I have regularly at breakfast and lunch to make BGs more predictable and me less grumpy. 🙂
I absolutely think that "eat to yr meter" is the best advice, and obviously that will often result in carbs < the usual guideline levels. Following that route, I went down to maybe 60g-70g carbs, without really wanting to reduce them. But then recently I've upped it to 150g+, with better BG results, by increasing fibre to the generally recommended ~30g levels. I suspect that I could get close to the 250g - 300g carb level by further increasing fibre. Obviously, that's just me & I wouldn't dream of eg going on a newbie thread & telling them that they have to do things the way I do.
What gets to me a bit is when I see newbies being told in definitive terms that such-and-such is true for
all T2's: no more than Xg of carbs; no this-or-that fruits or vegetables etc etc. Or that such things are true for
most T2's - it may be the case, but how would anyone know?
People generally don't want to argue; I think most lurkers (by far the majority of any audience in just about any on-line venue I've ever known much about) get put off by fruitless debate; and debate isn't appropriate for newbie threads.
The risk can be that people who aren't invested in strong, simple positions go away & that communities divide into their own separate echo-chambers for those who are. I've seen it happen over & over again, beginning with the olden days of USENET, when it was a DARPA-funded platform at universities for academics to flaunt their various personality defects & threaten to sue each other.
It's probably not that big a deal. Really, I think this place does one of the best jobs I've ever seen in getting the moderation balance right.