Flawed covid definitions, data and modelling

[everydayupsanddowns]

Mike,

You are asking me (which I am very surprised at to be honest) if I am deliberately trying to goad and irritate forum members? the answer to that is a clear no. I don't have an opinion on it, all was doing was trying to (objectively) offer anything that could look to show what was claimed. I've said over and over again, it's an easy theory to disprove. I'm not trying to annoy others either.

I am not claiming anything, just trying to be objective and open minded.

Perhaps it would be easier if you accepted other people’s explanations and/or opinions then, rather than continuing to press the point? I think it is this which gives the impression you give credence to the suggested theory.

Personally, I don’t feel it necessary to conduct an n=1 experiment on myself to show that this was not worth my while worrying about. Much less sharing it (promoting it?) on a public forum.

If your interest is merely academic and inquisitive (about this and other topics), I’m not sure you are presenting things in the way you intend. The fact that you share content gives the impression that you support the ideas suggested. I think you need to be much clearer if that isn’t the case. Especially where you are sharing increasingly niche views and content?

 

[Dave_Z1a]

The magnetic thing was quite interesting to see on tv, especially the live broadcast from Brazil where a news team was testing this on random members of the public, results were quite shocking and the studio soon cut the feed. Did a fair bit of investigation on Pfizers experimental so called vaccine, less so on others, and concluded it, or any of them certainly weren't for me. After reading some of the documents the court forced pfizer to release I an glad I didn't. Pfizers covid vaccine biological product file detailing the adverse reactions, deaths and injuries should have been made public knowledge in order that people could make more informed choices, their day of reckoning will come.