I haven’t been too bothered as I’ve seen a couple of private doctors who have done many test. Going forward I won’t be happy if it continues mind you the private ones always update my surgery so maybe they think I’ve got it all under control lol
Interesting topic.Good point @trophywench no they are not on there. Just records of letters that the consultants have sent to my gp, so they obviously are just very slack !
You need to ASK your GP surgery for access to your test results.Good point @trophywench no they are not on there. Just records of letters that the consultants have sent to my gp, so they obviously are just very slack !
I could wish I had been in the forum early enough to see this post. My GP and care nurse are of the opinion that you just live with it. Mine is quite bad and my feet are very numb. Its taken me 2 years to get them to correct my medical record to include DN. I do see Podiatry from time to time but they do no routine treatment these days, have to go private for routine foot care.Possibly a 'how longbis a piece of string question' but has anyone ever had their foot tickled and the result be their feet are at 'moderate risk'? I had them tested before Christmas but the nurse didn't seem concerned and didn't make any comment: it was only when I was looking at my NHS online file that I noticed it. I did ask the GP I saw the other day but his opinion was 'some diabetics have to live with neuropathy even with good control'. The issues with my feet have never been officially diagnosed, just tagged on as part of diabetes. Should I get on and accept that this is a part of life and just keep my fingers crossed I stay at moderate?! Maybe this is an impossible question to answer, common sense says go back to the surgery and ask but that's a mammoth task in itself and I'm not sure they actually know! Feels a bit like a 'computer says' scenario 😳🙄
Interesting topic.
I live in Bucks had my 'Whipples' surgery done in Oxford, who continue to monitor me post surgery, but discharged me back to my GP in Bucks. My chemo was in Bucks, but under an Onc'y from Oxford. My DSN was in Bucks, but because I moved to an Endo in Oxford (who understood the probs of having no panc'y) I now come under Oxford. My Gastro is in Bucks.
But Bucks can't see my Oxford data & vice versa; it appears that Trusts don't trust and won't share data. So reports and letters get sent from Oxford to my GP electronically, but not from Bucks or my GP to Oxford and I do my best to get digital copies and make sure those digital copies are passed to the different Dep'ts in Oxford. So when I look at my NHS records I can see that reports exist, but not read them. However, phone conversations with my Gastro and a Macmillan dietician, both in Bucks established that they can access all of the content of various reports, even though I can't.
But the Reception at my GP Surgery denied seeing a report from Oxford (requiring a prescription change), that I received by post some 10 days after the Consult, which says it was digitally sent to my GP and which (magically) showed up on my NHS record 24 hrs after speaking to Reception.
My conclusion: I think most digital records are accessible once in the system, but doubtful if non-digital correspondence is visible other than to the recipient. I find it frustrating and defeats the so-called progress of digital dependence.
Sorry, this has little to do with feet!