Inka
Well-Known Member
- Relationship to Diabetes
- Type 1
@silentsquirrel Consistency, yes 🙂 And comparing two amounts that have been achieved in the same way. Thank you.
I have added to my post!@silentsquirrel Consistency, yes 🙂 And comparing two amounts that have been achieved in the same way. Thank you.
Thanks for that explanationI think the issue is consistency. I understand the DAFNE course, of which I have no personal knowledge as a T2 on insulin, advises against counting carbs in most veg. Unless you eat an unusually high proportion of your meal as veg, this just makes life easier. Less work weighing/measuring and calculating. Your insulin:carb ratio will allow for this approach; if you were to count absolutely every carb your ratio would be slightly different. ………. Not counting relatively low carb veg saves time, effort and stress.
Yep I agree in any discussion all parties do need to be discussing the same thing.Let me try again @HSSS I am talking about comparing. We (not you and me, me and OP) can’t compare or discuss if we’re not both talking about the same thing - that is, if I’m talking about countable carbs and OP is talking about every single carb in veg. So we’re happily discussing and comparing but unknown to both of us we’re comparing ‘apples and oranges’ rather than ‘apples and apples’.
In principle I agree: there are more than enough decisions to make. However once I've decided to include all veg that means further decisions such as what weight is the portion, how fully are they being cooked (eg roasting pretty well makes all fibre become digestible, whereas blanched probably doesn't), so what carb rate is applicable? Hence when veg aren't included the workload is minimal from that 1st decision.My view is that is takes a couple of secs more to include the vegs carbs, and one less decision...like, do you start to count at carrots? At onions? At peas? At sweet potatoes?
I have emough decision to make, to be honest, and deciding what to count and what not to is another decision