So the new edition is out (although I just checked and mine isn't here yet )
I enjoy getting my copy and sit and read it within 1 day usually.
Thought it would be good to post any thoughts, what bits were good/bad etc.
Personally I prefer SWEET magazine, there is a better balance between type 1 as well as type 2 and has a whole family section for children with diabetes, a couple of my friends have featured already.
Balance is ok but mainly geared towards type 2 diabetes overall, which they know anyway. It has some go info pieces sometimes but they lack terribly in the childrens aspects, infact I will go so far as to say it is pretty damn rubbish for children with diabetes and they get their info wrong as well where children are concerned.
Whoops 😛
Personally I prefer SWEET magazine, there is a better balance between type 1 as well as type 2 and has a whole family section for children with diabetes, a couple of my friends have featured already.
Balance is ok but mainly geared towards type 2 diabetes overall, which they know anyway. It has some go info pieces sometimes but they lack terribly in the childrens aspects, infact I will go so far as to say it is pretty damn rubbish for children with diabetes and they get their info wrong as well where children are concerned.
Whoops 😛
........but the ads and the deluge of inserts with it, for hearing aids and walk in baths, give away the truth that it is aimed at the older generation...........Where can you get Sweet magazine? Is there an annual subscription and how much does it cost?
I never knew Balance was aimed at type 2's? I haven't opened the latest copy yet, it's only the third one I've got. It seems okay I skim read it sometimes there's useful stuff sometimes not, but isn't that the case for everything. And the adverts, wouldn't it be useful if you knew someone who would benefit, they're hardly offensive? Is Sweet a DUK publication?
They are so pro type 2 diabetes and they say that last year they were campaigning for children. Did you see any major campaign, nope. We saw the silent assassin (type 2 although it didn't say that), we saw the measure up, the year before (type 2 although it didn't say that).
..... more awareness should be raised about type 1 and diabetes in children. Working in a school I've seen first hand just how little is known about working with children with diabetes on a day to day basis.
There has been a massive data collection done (one of my friends has been involved) along with major players in the world of paediatric diabetes. I am just confirming that it is public knowledge and I can then share it with you, it is very very interesting indeed.
I'd be very interested to see that, Adrienne. It's something I feel strongly about, seeing both sides of it as a teacher and as a diabetic. I read in the paper the other day about a boy whose school refused to accommodate his diabetes and ended up being home schooled by his parents. Also a friend of mine has a newly diagnosed 6 yr old in her class. She was talking to me about how little she knew about what to do and how unsupportive her school was being in providing the help and daily support the child needed. She genuinely cares but without the support of her school there's only so much she can do (aside from do her own research obviously, which she has, but even so she has 29 other 6 yr olds in her care). I don't want to get into a slagging off of schools here... After all mine was fab when I was diagnosed in yr 6 and my secondary school was also brilliant. But I do feel children with diabetes at school need support and help in managing it and fitting it into their school day, and the staff need to be specifically trained as is appropriate.
mine still hasn't arrived yet.