At it again - Scientists create new corona virus with 100% fatality rate

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bruce Stephens said:
The hypothesis is dismissed here: https://healthfeedback.org/claimrev...ence-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-alter-dna-people/

I've no idea whether it was studied beforehand. I think it's reasonably likely (this is far from the first time anti vaccine people have suggested that a vaccine is changing our DNA) but it's also possible that it wasn't since it's so intrinsically unlikely (it's not easy to integrate DNA and there are plenty of DNA viruses which I'm sure would find doing so beneficial if it were easier).
Click to expand...
Bruce, the hypothesis of dna integration is proven to be right, see previous post link here.

The Florida surgeon general had recently written to the FDA asking if they had carried out dna integration assessments during the trials.

"On December 14, 2023, the FDA provided a written response providing no evidence that DNA integration assessments have been conducted to address risks outlined by the FDA themselves in 2007. Based on the FDA’s recognition of unique risks posed by DNA integration, the efficacy of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine’s lipid nanoparticle delivery system, and the presence of DNA fragments in these vaccines, it is essential to human health to assess the risks of contaminant DNA integration into human DNA. The FDA has provided no evidence that these risks have been assessed to ensure safety. As such, Florida State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo has released the following statement:

“The FDA’s response does not provide data or evidence that the DNA integration assessments they recommended themselves have been performed. Instead, they pointed to genotoxicity studies – which are inadequate assessments for DNA integration risk. In addition, they obfuscated the difference between the SV40 promoter/enhancer and SV40 proteins, two elements that are distinct.

DNA integration poses a unique and elevated risk to human health and to the integrity of the human genome, including the risk that DNA integrated into sperm or egg gametes could be passed onto offspring of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine recipients. If the risks of DNA integration have not been assessed for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, these vaccines are not appropriate for use in human beings.

Providers concerned about patient health risks associated with COVID-19 should prioritize patient access to non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and treatment. It is my hope that, in regard to COVID-19, the FDA will one day seriously consider its regulatory responsibility to protect human health, including the integrity of the human genome.”

www.floridahealth.gov

Florida State Surgeon General Calls for Halt in the Use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines | Florida Department of Health

Tallahassee, Fla.— On December 6, 2023, State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo sent a...
www.floridahealth.gov www.floridahealth.gov

Presence of viral spike protein and vaccinal spike protein in the blood serum of patients with long-COVID syndrome

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 patients experience, in 10-20% of the cases, a prolonged long-COVID syndrome, defined as the persistence of symptoms for at least two
www.europeanreview.org www.europeanreview.org
 

Attachments

  • pfizer vaccines dna found in human genome.jpg
    pfizer vaccines dna found in human genome.jpg
    118.5 KB · Views: 0
Bruce Stephens said:
www.politifact.com

Chinese scientists didn’t create 100% fatal COVID-19 strain

Should we panic? Social media users might after seeing online claims that researchers in China are concocting a disease
www.politifact.com www.politifact.com
Click to expand...
The term disease x was coined in 2018. A term invented to prepare for an unknown virus/disease that may appear in the future.

Lo and behold.....disease x arrived in 2019, Sars Cov 2. Almost as fortuitous/unlikely as when the first known covid transmission occurred in the UK in the very same leafy village (Haslemere in Surrey broadcast in 2018 ) as the prior BBC national "fake" pandemic contagion.

Contrary to what Tedros said, Gove recently said at the Covid inquiry that the world was not prepared for disease x (sars cov2).

www.youtube.com

LIVE from #WEF24 with @DrTedros: Preparing for a ‘Disease X’

www.youtube.com www.youtube.com

www.getsurrey.co.uk

BBC programme faked virus 'pandemic' in Haslemere two years ago

Contagion: The BBC Four Pandemic used Haslemere to launch its virus experiment
www.getsurrey.co.uk www.getsurrey.co.uk
 
Last edited:
Amity Island said:
Lo and behold.....disease x arrived in 2019, Sars Cov 2. Almost as fortuitous/unlikely as when the first known covid transmission occurred in the UK in the very same leafy village (Haslemere in Surrey broadcast in 2018 ) as the prior BBC national "fake" pandemic contagion.
Click to expand...
Coincidences happen.
 
Amity Island said:
There are coincidences and there are coincidences.
Click to expand...
I think conspiracists will find suspicious coincidences regardless. Had COVID-19 happened 5 or 10 years earlier they'd have found other smoking guns to point at (perhaps not TV shows, but maybe radio, films, or books, and perhaps not in English which might well have made them even more suspicious to English-speaking conspiracists). And had it happened somewhere other than Wuhan there'd have been another virology lab to point at (such labs tend to be near big population centres). (If it had happens much more than 10 years ago social media would have been less used so conspiracies might have been slower to develop and more fragmented.)
 
Bruce Stephens said:
I think conspiracists will find suspicious coincidences regardless. Had COVID-19 happened 5 or 10 years earlier they'd have found other smoking guns to point at (perhaps not TV shows, but maybe radio, films, or books, and perhaps not in English which might well have made them even more suspicious to English-speaking conspiracists). And had it happened somewhere other than Wuhan there'd have been another virology lab to point at (such labs tend to be near big population centres). (If it had happens much more than 10 years ago social media would have been less used so conspiracies might have been slower to develop and more fragmented.)
Click to expand...
Well, for me at least, a coincidence is something like three red coloured cars passing together or someone wearing the same dress at a party. These covid and pandemic things are beyond the accepted meaning of coincidence.

The chance of a pandemic starting (first known covid transmission in Haslemere) in the very same location as a televised national pandemic documentary is not what many would accept as coincidence.

Or that the first man in the world to be vaccinated was a William Shakespeare.

At what point do you start wondering Bruce?
 
Amity Island said:
Or that the first man in the world to be vaccinated was a William Shakespeare.
Click to expand...
Oh, I'm sure that was engineered. Probably not by much (I'd guess someone noticed there was a Bill Shakespeare in the first batch and made sure he was at the head because that's amusing and newsworthy). He wasn't the first person, that was Margaret Keenan. And they weren't the first people to receive the vaccine (since they came after the trials).
Amity Island said:
The chance of a pandemic starting (first known covid transmission in Haslemere) in the very same location as a televised national pandemic documentary is not what many would accept as coincidence.
Click to expand...
Would you have found something equally remarkable about a different place where the first known covid transmission happened? What if it's later found that the first transmission happened somewhere else?

I think that very much seems like a coincidence to me: I can imagine had the first death been of someone born in Haslemere (rather than the first known transmission) you'd be pointing at that as the remarkable coincidence instead.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top