• Please Remember: Members are only permitted to share their own experiences. Members are not qualified to give medical advice. Additionally, everyone manages their health differently. Please be respectful of other people's opinions about their own diabetes management.
  • We seem to be having technical difficulties with new user accounts. If you are trying to register please check your Spam or Junk folder for your confirmation email. If you still haven't received a confirmation email, please reach out to our support inbox: support.forum@diabetes.org.uk

AHA 2018 Cholesterol Management Guidelines

Status
This thread is now closed. Please contact Anna DUK, Ieva DUK or everydayupsanddowns if you would like it re-opened.

Eddy Edson

Well-Known Member
Relationship to Diabetes
In remission from Type 2
From AHA 2018 this month, updated cholesterol management guidelines with a detailed discussion of the evidence: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625

Summarising the D situation, below. Top-line: At least moderate statin treatment for diabetics, regardless of the traditional risk assessment.

upload_2018-11-21_22-33-21.png
upload_2018-11-21_22-33-51.png
 
Sod that for a game, I used to take statins, but not any more and my LDL is just fine. What they want do with fat Americans is their business. They’ve always wanted to put everyone on statins anyway.
 
There was a study quoted on here that showed a roughly parabolic relationship between cholesterol levels and mortality rates in women, ie there’s a sweet spot but too low is as bad as too high. I confess to not having the brain alertness to take in all the details when reading them in the evening after an early start and a day at work.
Does anyone remember the study I’m referring to and can critique its failings?
 
There was a study quoted on here that showed a roughly parabolic relationship between cholesterol levels and mortality rates in women, ie there’s a sweet spot but too low is as bad as too high. I confess to not having the brain alertness to take in all the details when reading them in the evening after an early start and a day at work.
Does anyone remember the study I’m referring to and can critique its failings?
Oh, that one that all the guru's jumped on?
The all causes curve?
Too low, and it killed you, too high and it killed you.
While glossing over the main causes of too low was malnutrition in third world countries, and too high was cardiac events in first world?
 
Oh, that one that all the guru's jumped on?
The all causes curve?
Too low, and it killed you, too high and it killed you.
While glossing over the main causes of too low was malnutrition in third world countries, and too high was cardiac events in first world?
I don’t know, that’s why I asked!
 
What about hepatotoxicity?
I can’t have chemo as the specialist says. Instead of the possibility of cancer killing you chemo will further damage your liver. I.e. you will die of liver failure instead.
 
Status
This thread is now closed. Please contact Anna DUK, Ieva DUK or everydayupsanddowns if you would like it re-opened.
Back
Top