Harshness noted, always difficult in replies as to who types quickest.Sorry yes: I think that's a great reply and hopefully I've now edited out the harshness from my comment.
My understanding of the Equality Act is that no specific illness or condition counts as a disability per se, because the impact of each illness and condition varies so widely from person to person.Interesting discussion and wonder if officially things like Diabetes can be considered a “ disability” so that it can be included in any “ disability equality” legislation which may prevent discrimination.
If that is the case I am happy to accept the definition but I do think as others have said it very much depends on your individual situation.
I certainly do not consider that my diabetes ( have no associated complications or co morbidity) makes me disabled as with medication I am able to live a completely normal life so do not require any additional support.
So I look upon it in exactly the same way I as do taking any of my other medication such as Creon/ or Statins. I acknowledge some may see that as a very narrow definition but that is how I see it.
... and I pride myself on my quick typing 🙄Harshness noted, always difficult in replies as to who types quickest!
Agree Cliff just think the law likes to be as be as “ objective” as possible by covering clearly defined groups as much as possible.My understanding of the Equality Act is that no specific illness or condition counts as a disability per se, because the impact of each illness and condition varies so widely from person to person.
I think this is a more appropriate approach to take rather than assuming that everyone who has (for example) diabetes is disabled, or that (for example) an autistic person who struggles with sensory sensitivities isn't disabled, even though their disability is invisible and poorly understood.
Thank you. Your apology is appreciated. The fear I have of losing PIP under the new guidance is so much to deal with on top of having to deal with all of the effects of my illnesses.Yes it was, and unnecessary, I really do offer my sincere apologies.
It was a very poor choice of words and mean't as 'Some of which may need a reality check' anyone with genuine needs should always be helped and supported.
My understanding of the Equality Act is that no specific illness or condition counts as a disability per se, because the impact of each illness and condition varies so widely from person to person.
I think this is a more appropriate approach to take rather than assuming that everyone who has (for example) diabetes is disabled, or that (for example) an autistic person who struggles with sensory sensitivities isn't disabled, even though their disability is invisible and poorly understood.
In terms of a cost:benefit analysis, I'd prefer the Government to focus on tax avoidance and evasion, rather than the "small number of people" who are allegedly claiming benefits to which they're not entitled.As for the large numbers of disabled people in general, it seems to me that genuine claimants are being attacked and blamed because a small number of claimants are playing the system. They should sort those out, not pick on people who are genuine.
In terms of a cost:benefit analysis, I'd prefer the Government to focus on tax avoidance and evasion, rather than the "small number of people" who are allegedly claiming benefits to which they're not entitled.
Thats 2 of us then......the anxiety is not welcome at allThe fear I have of losing PIP under the new guidance is so much to deal with on top of having to deal with all of the effects of my illnesses.
Yes, hopefully we're a more humane society than we were 40 years ago, in that we recognise a broader range of conditions that can be seriously disabling.Jeez, it would seem that I have had a disability for over 40 years and didn't know it.
"While insomnia itself is not typically considered a disability, chronic insomnia that persists for 12 months or longer and significantly impacts daily life may be considered a disability under the Equality Act 2010"
For reference, would someone be able to post a definition of disability. I'm interested in how a type 1 diagnosis isn't considered a disability. Thanks
Hi Mike,In my day-to-day life I don’t find my T1 particularly disabling, but legally I’m very glad T1 is defined as a disability. That’s why we are protected in the workplace etc, and cannot be discriminated against just because we have T1, and places like schools, universities, and employers have to make ‘reasonable adjustments’.
In other words, it can be down to the individual in how they see a disability rather the other way round e.g now you have type 1 diabetes you are now disabled, if you get my drift.
Your perception may be that some people have "far less onerous conditions". However, whereas on paper those people's conditions may seem far less onerous, you don't know what complications may ensue for individuals. Similarly, someone who doesn't know much about Type 1 Diabetes may think, "It's just a question of injecting yourself with insulin a few times a day".Hi Mike,
Agree with all that. My point (not clearly explained) was about how many with far less onerous conditions consider themselves disabled, when Type 1 diabetes is a substantial condition to live with and yet many Type 1's like you and me don't want to or feel they don't want to consider type 1 as a disablement.
In other words, it can be down to the individual in how they see a disability rather the other way round e.g now you have type 1 diabetes you are now disabled, if you get my drift.
No, not about perception, some people will have less onerous conditions and whilst they consider themselves disabled, Type 1's often don't.Your perception may be that some people have "far less onerous conditions".
No, not about perception, some people will have less onerous conditions and whilst they consider themselves disabled, Type 1's often don't.