Overall I have no doubt the DUK is intrinsically a good, well meaning organisation, in the very early days of diagnosis their support line helped me and in the past I have obtained information from their web site, which I feel is now lacking in the documents it used to contain, their efforts and means of communication to me as a member is purely through Balance, so this needs to be good and balanced.
I would be interested to know where 'Balances' editorial direction comes from, as it is becoming the source of much anguish within the diabetic community, I feel it is not to the same agenda as that of DUK.
The statement from ?the Balance team at DUK? yesterday was a farce, and really was an insult to the many fine people who work on the publication, however, they took collective responsibility for the action of one or two people and that while noble, it is wrong, why should innocent staff take the flack for what is clearly an editorial decision.
Of course, that said the balance team might be purely the editor (?!) and a designer, plus someone collating the articles from freelance journalists.
What I did notice on the blog of the editor via the DUK website is that he?s just returned from holidays to the sunny Costa del Merseyside? hmmm cosy, did he pop into see the said nurse? Also, they site wouldn't let me comment on his blog entry!
Clearly we are biased, but our dear friend and moderator Mr Northerner has published some quite superb poems about diabetes and some of the trials and tribulations, he?s offered these to Balance and they have declined his offer.
Perhaps someone should educate these people to the fact that humour and laughter is a good relief from all the stress and anxiety that diabetes throws at us? Again, a further illustration that they don't really know what its like to live with diabetes.