I don't suppose you have a DOI?Interestingly, there was a paper recently looking at correlations between large differences between CGM-predicted HbA1c (whatever it's called) and measured HbA1c. Apparently larger differences correlates with a particular kind of heart damage.
Does anyone know how the glycation of haemoglobin is affected by glucose - is it a concentration or a time effect (or more likely a combo of both?) With this information it would presumably be possible to predict a more accurate HbA1c from CGM data.
Similarly, do you recall where/when/who by chance?Ah that’s interesting @Bruce Stephens
I have heard similar in a conference presentation which was looking into differences in diabetes complications risk between individuals with the same HbA1c result.
Presumably those with more stable BG have better outcomes in general (sounds more plausible than the alternative anyway!) It would be interesting to see whether it's cumulative time above or simply total area above the curve which has the most effect (which links into my question about HbA1c above, assuming the damage mechanism is similar).
It would be interesting to see the numbers though, and specifically what HbA1c values these people had - if they were considering people at or around 50 mmol/mol, then that would indicate that even small perturbations are pretty deleterious, whereas if those being compared had HbA1c values in the 60s or 70s that gives much more room for manoeuvre/space for there to be different effects at play re time above vs area above the curve.