The_Bowlii
Well-Known Member
- Relationship to Diabetes
- Type 1
hi @SimonP. Yes, I can absolutely tell you’re an engineer 🙂 - I’m a research chemist by training but now work in a large engineering team so I recognise the symptoms!It's very early days for you, so you also have the added difficulties of the honeymoon period to contend with, so don't worry. Experimentation is key though, even once you think you've got everything sorted, it (diabetes response) randomly changes in my experience, so you need to (re)start the experimentation, so you may as well get used to the process 🙂
You can calculate how high you may end up going without bolus, and decide if you're relaxed about that - taking 20g of carbs might drive my BG up 6mmol/l. It's not the end of the world IMO. Ideally I'd do without the transient high, but the only way to work out how to do it is to practice, so that's what I'm doing.
Having BG numbers available at all times and being able to see TIR at all times is probably not very helpful psychologically for anyone. It's very useful to have the data available but it can lead to attempts to overcontrol and to stress when the numbers aren't quite right, even if over a longer averaging period things are actually perfectly fine. Don't get me wrong, having BG data is useful and I'd not want to go back - for longer term control optimisation (i.e. basal rate and carb sensitivity fixes) as well as for shorter term control, understanding responses to specific foods and making split dosing decisions, but there's a fine line between this and attempting to overcontrol (ending up with stress about the values and annoying BG oscillations - I'm an engineer, can you tell? 🙂). I don't feel this is very helpful if you want to balance good BG control with leading a relatively normal life and doing normal things. Others may disagree, that's fine, I'm happy to discuss elsewhere, I like a good discussion 🙂
I tend to do at least a 1h ride most days for BG control purposes (though not this week due to rain and volume of work and my BG is running high because of that - I need to setup my turbo). This exercise means my BG is more stable and I run lower in general (and I get fitter too and probably accrue some other exercise health benefits as handy side effects). I sit in range during these rides without the transient highs caused by eating while riding (and the same is generally true for my commutes) or I use these short rides to fix highs rather than injecting a correction (though this is a "dangerous" thing as I sometimes don't bother to inject a correction expecting to go out soon, only to find someone books a last minute meeting so I've run high for no reason and still need to do the correction - setting up the turbo will fix this, Teams calls while riding 🙂).
Riding longer rides, which is where I tend to have the transient highs when I set off, is not essential for BG management, however I enjoy pushing the distances and seeing new things, so while I can't claim it has a diabetes-related physiological purpose it does have a quality of life purpose and I'm happy to trade off the transient high against that. There are no hard figures to calculate the cost-benefit trade-off between these psychological aspects and the bad effects of running high for a given period of time. If there were, I wonder if that would actually be better - more data to stress about 🙂
I feel I may have gone off track a little, nothing new! 🙂
Great feedback, thank you. You’re correct - I spend all day stressing about levels now I’ve got the CGM Libre2 and app. TIR is around 84% over the past month which the consultant said was good but being a perfectionist has its drawbacks :-(.
Like you, I use exercise to correct highs but I do seem very sensitive. Just walked for 20 mins to catch a train and got the low level 4.5 mmol/l alarm even though I was over 7 mmol/l when I set out! No IoB so a bit surprised and sorted with a couple of jelly babies. I used to like them but I’m starting to go off them 🙂.
Cheers, Chris