I think the question is a little ambiguous.
Are we talking total calories for the extent of the match or the rate at which calories are burned during the match. It also may depend how many players there are. In tennis it's only two or four, but football they've got 22 plus substitutes.
I can see some sports which are low burn but end up using lots of calories because the match is longer. For example, they must burn quite a few calories playing 5 day cricket, even the guys just standing around in the field!
Anyway, I'll plump for ..... water polo.
Andy 🙂