• Please Remember: Members are only permitted to share their own experiences. Members are not qualified to give medical advice. Additionally, everyone manages their health differently. Please be respectful of other people's opinions about their own diabetes management.
  • We seem to be having technical difficulties with new user accounts. If you are trying to register please check your Spam or Junk folder for your confirmation email. If you still haven't received a confirmation email, please reach out to our support inbox: support.forum@diabetes.org.uk

Whatever is happening to the NHS?

Status
This thread is now closed. Please contact Anna DUK, Ieva DUK or everydayupsanddowns if you would like it re-opened.
Elle certainly has a point about many people not doing enough for themselves. We on this forum and I am sure that people on other forums are just the same do everything we can as good as we can of that I am sure. However there are people that don't I know two type ones, one is my oldest brother the other is a colleague. They rarely test unless they think something is seriously wrong and when they do it is usually in double figures (I have yet to see a figure of below 18 from either of them) they both have a morning/evening set time injection regime and both have recently suffered complication as a result.

The thing I find most alarming is that when I try to explain to them (probably comes across as a constant nagging) they both are under the belief that it's the hospitals problem because they take their insulin as prescribed, it must be the diabetes center that has done something wrong or calculated the insulin requirement wrong and they will mention it at the next appointment. The colleague was diagnosed not long before myself at the age of about 48 my brother was diagnosed at 16 and is now 46, he has just become a father for the first time which is even more of a concern as now the wife has had to start nagging him as well.

These maybe exceptions they maybe more normal than we would like to believe but whatever they are there are definitely people out there costing the NHS with conditions that could be avoided.

The other side of the coin I talk about is that there are people that want to manage their condition better but are being restricted by refusal of test strips, this will undoubtedly lead to much higher costs in treating the complications.

Incidentally my other brother is a type 2, rare as he has never been overweight nor physically inactive as he loves his sport and football. He takes his condition very seriously and has completely changed his diet and uses my tester whenever I'm on the same shift to see how he is getting on (we know all about type 2's and test strips) his hba1c is now a completely normal 6. P.S I did of course offer him one of my spare testers 😉

I would love to see a better diabetes education on diagnosis for all and I can't complain at my treatment at all as I have been given everything and more. The difference as I see it is that I show an interest and ask questions and want to improve I can only assume that the two people I have talked about don't show the same enthusiasm in their review as I and others show.


The NHS isn't perfect and it probably could be better funded it may even have been better to not re-structure it at this time, it may even be better managed but I know one thing for sure.

WE ARE VERY LUCKY TO HAVE IT, it is without doubt one of the finest organizations in the world without doubt.
 
funnily enough both a Diabetic Consultant and an Opthalmic optician I know both say the photo is no substitute for a live examination with drops and an opthalmascope by someone who knows what they doing. Many diabetics I know get the same message year after year from the photos - slight damage no treatment needed.
The guidelines used to say an examination with drops in was recommended once a year. The annual photo seems to be a cheap, mass substitute for that.
 
funnily enough both a Diabetic Consultant and an Opthalmic optician I know both say the photo is no substitute for a live examination with drops and an opthalmascope by someone who knows what they doing. Many diabetics I know get the same message year after year from the photos - slight damage no treatment needed.
The guidelines used to say an examination with drops in was recommended once a year. The annual photo seems to be a cheap, mass substitute for that.

What happened with me was that they noticed from the photos that I had slight changes near the macula, so I was referred to the eye consultant for live examinations for about 18 months. Once they were satisfied that the problem hadn't progressed I was put back on the photos.
 
P.S. I have postponed your ‘O’ level as you spelt my name wrong!

How kind of you.
When you are perfect let me know and I will announce it it the times.
Proof reading also needs a little work. :D:D:D
.
.
.
.
Sorry, but the extremely cheeky side of me just couldn't resist Sue.
Honest it's just a little fun! :D
I wouldn't / couldn't be nasty to any of you guys on here, you have provided too much help over the years! It just made me smile.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, but the extremely cheeky side of me just couldn't resist Sue.
Honest it's just a little fun! :D
I wouldn't / couldn't be nasty to any of you guys on here, you have provided to much help over the years! It just made me smile.

I think you meant 'too' there Jimbo 😉 :D
 
I think you meant 'too' there Jimbo 😉 :D

😱 I think you are right Alan, People in glass houses eh? 😱:

Now Edited!

Alan 1, Jim 0.
I really should learn to raed and right propperlly eh?
 
Last edited:
Status
This thread is now closed. Please contact Anna DUK, Ieva DUK or everydayupsanddowns if you would like it re-opened.
Back
Top