Maybe a bit interesting: even the non-lean subjects in this study didn't seem to have very elevated BP or cholesterol levels, despite having high body fat, big waists, high BG.
Aims/hypothesis Apparent type 2 diabetes is increasingly reported in lean adult individuals in sub-Saharan Africa. However, studies undertaking robust clinical and metabolic characterisation of lean individuals with new-onset type 2 diabetes are limited in this population. This cross-sectional...
link.springer.com
Median HbA1c 86 mmol/mol, non-HDL cholesterol 3.1, trigs 1.4, LDL 2.6, HDL 0.9. SBP 127. Apart from the HbA1c, a lot of people would say those numbers are *not bad*.
I was much leaner than this group at DX, at BMI of 25 point something, with a similar HbA1c of 89, but my non-HDL was 4.7, trigs 3.2, LDL 3.6, HDL 0.8, SBP 180 ... I don't think my numbers were very bad, relative to a European late middle age poorly controlled T2D population, but they were way worse than the Ugandan overweight/obese T2D group in this study.
How much due to different nutrition, activity levels etc, how much to genetics? How if at all does it relate to the apparent higher prevalence of the beta cell issues identified here?
I don't know enough about the biology to have an opinion on whether the biochem metabolic syndrome markers the paper discusses look betetr or worse than in other populations, but it would be interesting to see a comparison.