MCH
Well-Known Member
- Relationship to Diabetes
- Type 1
- Pronouns
- She/Her
I am so annoyed today.
I went to get a blood test - which resulted from the doctor wanting me to start on statins to reduce my cholesterol from 4.6. I went to the chemist and picked up the prescription, but after reading the side effects (which he had not mentioned) chose NOT to take them. (Instead, I stopped eating cheese and as much fat as I could avoid for a fortnight as I had to return today to get a blood test to check that the tablets had not affected my liver though I had assumed – incorrectly as it turned out- that I would get a basic cholesterol test s par t of the test.)
When I went this morning, the nurse (and I know it’s not her fault) refused to take the blood test because I have not started the tablets. This has means that although the info in the tablet box suggested that I should not take them unless I had already tried reducing my cholesterol via altering my diet, I have no official idea whether this has had any effect.
By the time I left the surgery, I was almost in tears – how pathetic is that for a 44 year old woman?
I have spent two weeks not eating fat if I could help it so that I could see if this had any/enough effect on my levels and it all seems to have come to NOTHING! The nurse said if I had not been taking the tablets, there was no point in carrying out the tests the doctor had wanted, but to be fair to her, she could not authorize a straightforward cholesterol test – even thought that would have been presumably cheaper as it is fewer tests that the doctor wanted.
The result is that I now have an appointment next week (with a different GP) to discuss side effects, but no member of the medical profession has suggested what I gather is the sensible option of getting a fasting test to ascertain what the ration of “good” cholesterol to “bad” is
The really stupid bit about the whole thing is it REALLY stems from the fact that the first doctor didn’t mention side effects at all – though when I think about it I suppose the fact he told me I needed a blood test a fortnight after staring the tablets WAS him discussing them with me.
I went to get a blood test - which resulted from the doctor wanting me to start on statins to reduce my cholesterol from 4.6. I went to the chemist and picked up the prescription, but after reading the side effects (which he had not mentioned) chose NOT to take them. (Instead, I stopped eating cheese and as much fat as I could avoid for a fortnight as I had to return today to get a blood test to check that the tablets had not affected my liver though I had assumed – incorrectly as it turned out- that I would get a basic cholesterol test s par t of the test.)
When I went this morning, the nurse (and I know it’s not her fault) refused to take the blood test because I have not started the tablets. This has means that although the info in the tablet box suggested that I should not take them unless I had already tried reducing my cholesterol via altering my diet, I have no official idea whether this has had any effect.
By the time I left the surgery, I was almost in tears – how pathetic is that for a 44 year old woman?
I have spent two weeks not eating fat if I could help it so that I could see if this had any/enough effect on my levels and it all seems to have come to NOTHING! The nurse said if I had not been taking the tablets, there was no point in carrying out the tests the doctor had wanted, but to be fair to her, she could not authorize a straightforward cholesterol test – even thought that would have been presumably cheaper as it is fewer tests that the doctor wanted.
The result is that I now have an appointment next week (with a different GP) to discuss side effects, but no member of the medical profession has suggested what I gather is the sensible option of getting a fasting test to ascertain what the ration of “good” cholesterol to “bad” is
The really stupid bit about the whole thing is it REALLY stems from the fact that the first doctor didn’t mention side effects at all – though when I think about it I suppose the fact he told me I needed a blood test a fortnight after staring the tablets WAS him discussing them with me.
Last edited: