I cannot correct, it's taking 4 hrs to get back down to normal. Corrected after 2 hrs and it just added it on end and hypo.
Hello
@Vamppir8,
Apologies if there is some repeating in my response; I know you are T3c, but from panc'y damage and not from a total panc'y - I can't remember the fine details and our Internet is misbehaving; so scrolling and searching is not fun today.
I fully agree with
@rebrascora, sometimes having that extra CGM visibility can be less helpful and it sounds as if you reacted too promptly. There is a basic principle of avoiding stacking a 2nd load of corrective insulin on top of corrections you already have on board. I have no experience with Fiasp, but the principle will apply.
Dr Bernstein in his book Diabetes Solutions (which I'm only 20% through) talks about the greater any one insulin dose then the less reliable the outcome. He suggests no one dose should be more than 7 units and if it is then administer that split into 2, or more, parts. The observation is that a large shot of insulin doesn't release into one's blood the way we assume - all or only a small part could move into the blood and the rest may or may not subsequently get there. So dosing technique can be a factor of confusion.
Also, the food that you are bolusing for has both a carb content and a glycaemic release speed (often referred to as Glycaemic Index (GI). So timing of pre-bolus is intrinsically related to the Glycaemic Load (carbs & GI). This is barely a mathematical based science, but more of an abstract art! Yet is real enough and needs trial and error to establish what works for you with any one meal type.
Then there is a certain amount of further vulnerability from your Creon capsules- did you take sufficient for that particular meal? Did all the carbs you bolused for get digested and turned into the anticipated glucose.
So it's all pretty tricky trying to accurately 2nd guess what is going on and thus how to respond - correction or more carbs; and if more carbs fast JBs or slower biscuits?
I saw earlier today you'd found Diabox. Did you install that? When I had it working it was even more helpful than LibreLink. One reason was the dual alarms for both lows and highs, along with the option of personalised alarm sounds. For low you can have it set at an upper "alert" level, as high as 6.8, with a less urgent sound to let you know your BG is falling. Then a further alarm (or alert) nearer to a hypo threshold, with a more strident sound (eg a siren). Also the Diabox trend arrows have numerical calibration - so you know just how quickly change is happening. The Libre trends are a really good thing, but feel clumsy and basic once you've got that trend quantified as with Diabox. All of this means that you have continuous and quantified visibility of change. My own T3c is considered as very brittle (none of the normal panc'y hormones) and I found I had much better management when Diabox was available to me.
I personally think having any low alarm at or near 4 is too low, too late. I prefer to think of the alarm as an ALERT, allowing me to see, take stock and then respond - all quite quickly. I now have very, very few hypos and just the odd 'almost' hypo - invariably because I've misjudged something; but really easily caught and salvaged before it even becomes a mild hypo. I've stopped counting accurately, but no deep hypos and some 5 or 6 mild hypos throughout 2022. I am in no doubt that managing my D is intrusive to my lifestyle; but it was less intrusive and produced better HbA1c outcome when I had Diabox working. Monitoring and responding was so much simpler.