the child already has type one. Our area advisor told us we needed to do one
They are diagnosed and asymptomatic. We have had training from the parents but I just wanted to guidance as to the main areas to cover on a risk assessment.Then they’re not asymptomatic. I thought you meant they’d been identified in a study as being at risk of Type 1.
If the child is pre-school age, then they would need watching around some foods, eg if you were, say, making something very sweet. They’d also need watching around all foods as they’d need their carbs counted and appropriate insulin administered. Obviously hypos are a big risk, so you’d need a plan to identify and deal with those and training for staff.
If you haven’t yet had input from medical people and the child’s parent(s), then it would be best to wait and follow their advice as to the risk assessment.
training has been from the parentsHave you had any training/input from a specialist nurse or the parents in order to understand the child's risks and needs?
Using the term "asymptomatic" is a little confusing for us with regard to Type 1 diabetes. It just doesn't seem applicable, probably because the most serious symptoms are those of an overdose of medication rather than the diabetes itself. ie a hypo.... dangerously low Blood Glucose. Hypers (high Blood Glucose) are generally less serious or obvious and are less of a short term concern, whereas hypos need immediate treatment and are potentially life threatening.
They are diagnosed and asymptomatic. We have had training from the parents but I just wanted to guidance as to the main areas to cover on a risk assessment.
Which is of course a very dangerous situation!Perhaps they mean no obvious hypo symptoms?
Perhaps they mean no obvious hypo symptoms?
Does duk have some document/ guidelines on this? It must come up often for schools, preschool/afterschool clubs.
I take it when you say preschool you are talking children under 5, is that right?
Perhaps they mean no obvious hypo symptoms?