Hi all,
Lucky to have managed remission now. My GP was reticent to say I was in remission till I told him I understood it didn't mean 'gone', just sort of on 'pause', then he was fine with the label (though my records don't show this, which is mildly annoying). One thing he said I thought was interesting was that at a hbA1c of 35, I have a lot of 'headroom' and should losen up my control a little. (My reading of this is that he felt I was probably being a little too careful and he was concerned in terms of quality of life but if he saw the amount of chocolate I manage to eat with a hbA1c of 35, he'd probably change his mind!
) But is the idea of having headroom to be a bit freer with my glucose control at a hbA1c of 35 remotely an accurate description? I don't especially want to be popping well into the 40s next year, even if the relative risk to myself is low. I totally expect it to creep up over time due to age/etc., but I found the slightly loose approach to my hbA1c a bit odd. His aim was to stay under 52, if memory serves, whereas I'd like to stay in well below diagnosis (and ideally pre-diabetic) levels if possible. Thoughts? Ideas?
Lucky to have managed remission now. My GP was reticent to say I was in remission till I told him I understood it didn't mean 'gone', just sort of on 'pause', then he was fine with the label (though my records don't show this, which is mildly annoying). One thing he said I thought was interesting was that at a hbA1c of 35, I have a lot of 'headroom' and should losen up my control a little. (My reading of this is that he felt I was probably being a little too careful and he was concerned in terms of quality of life but if he saw the amount of chocolate I manage to eat with a hbA1c of 35, he'd probably change his mind!