If I had any choice in the matter (which I don't!) I'd have a pump and cgm that communicate. The main advantage of a cgm over the libre, as I see it, is that the cgm warns you audibly of impending hypos and when your bg is dropping faster than normal. When you're busy - it's invaluable.
I'm going to be having another 'discussion' with my consultant later this month about another application for cgm funding - in which he would provide sufficient evidence of 'clinical exceptionality' (unlike last time).
😡
Having a pump really changed my life. I was injecting 10/12 times a day
😱 (because of being a gutless wonder!) . It involves a lot of hard work and commitment - it's certainly not the easy option to start with. However, it's worth the work.
If I had to choose one or the other, I think I'd go for the cgm (by the smallest of margins) as it's a lifesaver. The pump is more convenient. In my opinion - I'm only slightly biased
- us people without a pancreas ought to get both a pump and cgm.
I'm trying to find out, but they are not communicating with me, whether the consultant said I was T1 when applying for the pump funding. This has an impact on the application for the cgm funding.