NHS could have avoided WannaCry hack with basic IT security' says report

Status
Not open for further replies.

Northerner

Admin (Retired)
Relationship to Diabetes
Type 1
The NHS could have avoided the crippling effects of the “relatively unsophisticated” WannaCry ransomware outbreak in May with “basic IT security”, according to an independent investigation into the cyberattack.

The National Audit Office said that 19,500 medical appointments were cancelled, computers at 600 GP surgeries were locked and five hospitals had to divert ambulances elsewhere.

“The WannaCry cyber attack had potentially serious implications for the NHS and its ability to provide care to patients,” said Amyas Morse, the head of the NAO.

“It was a relatively unsophisticated attack and could have been prevented by the NHS following basic IT security best practice. There are more sophisticated cyber-threats out there than WannaCry so the Department and the NHS need to get their act together to ensure the NHS is better protected against future attacks.”

https://www.theguardian.com/technol...-hack-basic-it-security-national-audit-office
 
Well, I could have told the NHS that, they didn't need an investigation. It's like they got a padlock out of a Christmas cracker, which had been knocking around for a few years and had rusted through, and thought "that'll protect the safe, no need for deadlocks or keypads or finger print technology or anything fancy like that ... " 🙄
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top