A positive for antibodies is highly accurate confirming type 1 (with a few rare exceptions).
A negative for antibodies isn’t so accurate for eliminating it ie you can be type 1 and not have antibodies showing.
Now that may be because the test only aimed at a specific antibody (eg GAD) and not a less common one that might be the issue or once the beta cells are destroyed there’s no need for the antibodies any longer or some other explanation but it is frequently discussed that is not an absolute result. That’s one reason they also do cpeptide levels and a fuller panel of less common antibodies.
Of course a person might not be type 1, they might type 2 with very high insulin resistance perhaps or a type 3c that has sustained damage to the pancreas eg by drugs, surgery, disease, accident etc. However I feel it’s important to get as much info as possible at diagnosis if it’s unclear as it can be stubbornly difficult to get reclassified later. In the short term it may not appear to matter if you’re getting insulin regardless but access to specialists and to nhs technologies are all dependent to a significant degree on type. Also the realistic treatment options could be significantly different if you are type 2; eg diet will never put type 1 in remission where medication is no longer needed but it very well might a type 2 where insulin is still high but hugely resistant.