Really don't know why they issue the Dexcom's without checking what phones they have first.
At first glance, I absolutely agree with you
@Rachelj. Alas, it is way more tricky than my first glance.
Personally, despite my own engineering background and former regular user of all sorts of tech, I am increasingly finding that seemingly 'clever' people are happy to produce solutions that are thoughtless for the user and underperform in practice. Secondly it is really challenging for a Health Care Practicioner (HCP) to keep abreast of the myriad of subtle but critical changes in the phone manufacturer's hardware and software. That is without the additional changes in operating systems and upgrades because these clever people write codes that are too easily 'hacked' by idiots and criminals for essentially malicious purposes. Thirdly, even when the CGM provider might have started with best intentions, they have put onto the "Health Market" a product that has had to go through a rigorous approval process; from that moment onwards even a small change to either improve their product or just keep up with the changing operating system changes is 'fraught', to say the least. The slightest change to the currently approved product needs to be re-appraised which takes time and costs money; at this point the cost overheads and financial overview overtakes any common sense about correcting, improving, upgrading etc of the original product.
Meanwhile HCPs are overloaded with patients, mostly with different needs in the details of their needs and varying degrees of understanding about what they have receiving from that script or what they need to know. They are prescribing a product for which the NHS process hasn't necessarily done its best "due diligence", and if it has there will be a volume of paperwork to read (and understand!) about the device - so (surprise, surprise!) the patient can be poorly served.
It's wrong, but sometimes inevitable. I'm not defending this and I personally am super critical of the constant flow (rather than trickle) of shortcomings: but by writing this catalogue of challenges I am attempting to manage my expectations, plus those of anyone who reads this. There are several forum members who can explain it all a lot better than I have.
The Libre Reader is a solution: it doesn't change and works regardless of phone and app software / hardware. But it's a crude, basic device that had a colour change in between Libre 1 and Libre 2 but remained otherwise unchanged: basic and crude. Dexcom Receivers are a little more modern and seem to be upgraded with each sensor new release. My G7 Receiver is continuous, works in parallel with the phone app and usefully independently; none of this Freestyle nonsense about activating the app and the Reader in a particular sequence. It allows some data to be logged such as meals and insulin; but nothing about activity - which is just as fundamental to how we metabolise food as part of our BG management.
My D Consultant last week reminded my wife that I make 350 decisions every single day of the year as part of my D management. A small no of those decisions are vital, most are more routine. Collectively they are extremely stressful. All the Agencies in this business of D management could do a lot worse than take this aspect of relieving stress on board and try a lot harder to get things right for the Patient, first time round. They are trying - you can interpret trying in different ways.