Labour asks government to explain failure to investigate Matt Hancock

Status
Not open for further replies.

Northerner

Admin (Retired)
Relationship to Diabetes
Type 1
Labour has formally sought an explanation from the government as to why there has been no investigation into whether Matt Hancock broke the law during his relationship with an aide, despite what the party called “clear evidence” of a breach.

The Labour request, in a letter to the attorney general, Michael Ellis, comes as a political thinktank argued that Hancock’s behaviour highlighted the need for the ministerial code to be underpinned by law.

The Institute for Government (IFG) report cited the decision not to dismiss Hancock, who resigned as health secretary, and said that, in light of other government revelations such as about lobbying on behalf of Greensill Capital, Boris Johnson had allowed standards of ministerial behaviour to weaken.

Hancock was pictured in an embrace at his office with Gina Coladangelo, a longtime friend and a non-executive director at Hancock’s health department, on 6 May.

The Labour letter, signed by Charles Falconer, the shadow attorney general, David Lammy, the shadow justice secretary, and Nick Thomas-Symonds, the shadow home secretary, notes that Hancock’s contact with Coladangelo was not permitted under social distancing rules in place at the time.


It's so wrong that Hancock isn't being investigated. It's blatantly obvious that it wasn't just that one occasion that he broke the rules, he was in a close relationship with her, quite possibly over a number of months and possibly throughout the pandemic. Bad enough when other people in authority break the rules - but he was the HEALTH SECRETARY for heaven's sake! 😡 There should be consequences.:(
 
He won’t be investigated, because the “Prime Minister” doesn’t think he’s done anything wrong, including appointing this woman to the DoH board without due process.

And playing away while married is a way of life for Boris, as is lying about it, so he’s no judge of personal conduct in public office.
 
He won’t be investigated, because the “Prime Minister” doesn’t think he’s done anything wrong, including appointing this woman to the DoH board without due process.

And playing away while married is a way of life for Boris, as is lying about it, so he’s no judge of personal conduct in public office.
Heaven forfend that BJ gets accused of double-standards 🙂
 
He won’t be investigated, because the “Prime Minister” doesn’t think he’s done anything wrong, including appointing this woman to the DoH board without due process.
They've insisted that there was due process, and also that the process is "transparent". I've not seen any descriptions at all of what the process actually is or anything at all about her appointment (except that it was according to this transparent appointment process), which suggests they're using a non-standard meaning of "transparent" (which would explain quite a lot).
 
Brushed under carpet & forgotten about as far as Boris is concerned, just like when Cummings broke rules lied thru his teeth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top