I completely understand your worries
@SMM - and know just what you mean about the loss of spontaneity
I think having a gadget like Libre which can ‘fill in the blanks’ between fingersticks can be fascinating and really quite motivating for some people (and actually quite overwhelming for others).
Because you can see the effect of your actions rolling out, more or less in realtime it can really help you to tweak your approaches to food, and see the results of those changes in smoother traces.
And if you can see that you are making improvements, it can be very tempting to aim for higher and higher ‘time in range’ numbers - almost becoming like a game.
This is all well and good, but it can slightly take over if you let it!
IMO it is important to keep a bit of balance between aiming for BG results that you are happy with, which offer reasonable chances of long-term health, and with the rest of ‘life’. So that you have a sustainable, flexible and enjoyable way of living where diabetes fits around you rather than the other way around.
There’s no clinical need to aim for anything like 98% Time in Range. The international consensus suggests 70%+ is optimal, with no more than 4% of readings below 4.0
🙂
I've been meaning to post this for ages, but kept forgetting! At the ADA this year the international consensus paper on TIR (time in range) was published by a panel of experts with a huge amount of knowledge and expertise in supporting people to use continuous data to help manage their...
forum.diabetes.org.uk