I did thanks. These are my long term resultsWelcome to the forum
We have a whole range of dietary approaches on the forum, some moderate, low, or very low carb, and others who have opted for Newcastle very low calorie approaches, or weight loss through adapted Slimming World or Weightwatchers style programmes.
You have to find a system that works for you 🙂
I did thanks. These are my long term results
Diagnosed 30/10/2015 HbA1c 70 weight 143 kg
18/12/2015 HbA1c 45 weight 132.5 kg
26/01/2016 HbA1c 36 weight 125 kg
19/07/2016 HbA1c 27 weight 110kg Total Cholesterol 5.6 no breakdown (useless!)
13/01/2017 HbA1c 27 weight 103kg Total Cholesterol 5.7 HDL 1.46 Trigs 0.8
18/07/2017 HbA1c 29 weight 97.8kg Total Cholesterol 6.0 HDL 1.72 Trigs 0.6
18/10/2017 HbA1c 28 weight 96.34kg Total Cholesterol 7.3 HDL 1.60 Trigs 1.3
15/10/2018 HbA1c 27 weight 95.35kg Total Cholesterol 6.3 HDL 1.51 Trigs1.0
14/01/2020 HbA1c 27 weight 91.17kg Total Cholesterol 8.2 HDL 1.74 Trigs 0.92
03/06/2020 HbA1c 27 weight 90.36kg Total Cholesterol 7.1 HDL 1.35 Trigs 1.8
01/12/2020 HbA1c 29 weight 94.35kg Total Cholesterol 6.7 HDL 1.57 Trigs 1.21
17/06/2021 HbA1c 28 weight 99.00kg Total Cholesterol 7.8 HDL 1.7 Trigs 1.0
10/12/2021 HbA1c 30 weight 103.5 kg Total Cholesterol 8.2 HDL 1.75 Trigs 0.9
14/06/2022 HbA1c 30 Weight 103.2kg Total Cholesterol 8.9 HDL 1.6 Trigs 2.0 (38 hour fast pre bloods)
24/08/2022 HbA1c 29 weight 106.2 kg Total Cholesterol 7.3 HDL 1.67 Trigs 0.93 Predict study data
I certainly don't see it as a problem with a trig/HDL ratio of 0.93/1.67 = 0.556
"High total cholesterol" is a meaningless number anyway in my view (and that of many heart disease specialists).
I’d see a cholesterol level in the 7s as a problem. That’s what leaps out at me from your chart. The BMI would be interesting too though, as you could be very short or very tall.
Yet LDL is never used to predict heart attack risk in the QRisk calculation.. ever wondered why that might be?LDL in the high 6's and 7's and I'd think "Erm?"
I beg to differ but ratios are indeed used a lot (and should be used more).Ratio's aren't really used anymore.
It's all about the numbers now.
Why? Because they are considered by some as "bad cholesterol"?LDL in the high 6's and 7's and I'd think "Erm?"
Why? Because they are considered by some as "bad cholesterol"?
I see LDL for what it is ... a calculated number with little to no meaning. I'm perfectly happy with mine thanks.We all make the choices we need to, if you choose to see LDL as good, that's your choice.
I see LDL for what it is ... a calculated number with little to no meaning. I'm perfectly happy with mine thanks.
Why would you see it as a problem?I’d see a cholesterol level in the 7s as a problem. That’s what leaps out at me from your chart. The BMI would be interesting too though, as you could be very short or very tall.
Why would you see it as a problem?
Without cholesterol we'd all be dead.
My BMI is about 30 on average.
Why would you see it as a problem?
Without cholesterol we'd all be dead.
My BMI is about 30 on average.
Help to do what?Without water we’d all be dead but that doesn’t mean it’s a good idea to drink gallons a day.
Could getting your BMI down below 25 help further?